Find Acceleration of Wedge with Rope Pulled by Constant Force T

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vibhor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Wedge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a wedge when a rope is pulled by a constant force T, with all surfaces being smooth and frictionless. The user initially derived an equation for acceleration but found a discrepancy between their calculated value of 2.28 m/s² and the expected answer of 1.3 m/s². Participants pointed out potential errors in the assumptions about the block's acceleration components and the forces acting on it. The user acknowledged a mistake in their approach regarding the block's motion relative to the wedge. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly resolving forces in physics problems.
Vibhor
Messages
971
Reaction score
40

Homework Statement


[/B]
In the attached picture, the rope is being pulled by a constant force T. All the surfaces are smooth. The pulley and the rope are massless and frictionless. Find the acceleration of the wedge.(use g=10ms-2)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The normal force between the block and wedge is represented by N and acceleration of the wedge by 'a'.

Writing ∑F = Ma for the wedge in horizontal direction , ##Nsinθ + Tcosθ -T = Ma## .

Resolving forces on the block in direction perpendicular to the surface of wedge , ##N=mgcosθ##

Using the above two equations , a = ##\frac{mgcosθsinθ + Tcosθ -T}{M}## .

This gives a = 2.28ms-2 towards left. But the answer given is 1.3ms-2 .

Could somebody help me identify the mistake .

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • wedge.PNG
    wedge.PNG
    3.3 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is there any acceleration to the left? It would seem that gravity and the rope would both apply forces to the right. And the rope and pulley are said to be frictionless -- but what about between the block and ramp?
 
Vibhor said:
Resolving forces on the block in direction perpendicular to the surface of wedge , ##N=mgcosθ##

Looks like you are assuming that the block has no component of acceleration perpendicular to the wedge. Is that so?
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
TSny said:
Looks like you are assuming that the block has no component of acceleration perpendicular to the wedge. Is that so?

Terrible mistake on my part o:)

Thanks a lot !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top