Find an orthogonal quantum state: introduction to dirac notation.

knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose we have a spin 1/2 Particle in a prepared state:

\left|\Psi\right\rangle = \alpha \left|\uparrow\right\rangle + \beta\left|\downarrow\right\rangle

where

\left|\uparrow\right\rangle \left|\downarrow\right\rangle

are orthonormal staes representing spin up and spin down respectively.

also: \left|\alpha\right|^2 + \left|\beta\right|^2 = 1

\alpha & \beta are complex numbers.

find a state which is orthogonal to \left|\Psi\right\rangle

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I went about this first by saying that the inner product of two states which are orthogonal is 0, so propose that:

\left\langle\Phi\right|\left|\Psi\right\rangle = 0

where
\left|\Phi\right\rangle = \gamma\left|\uparrow\right\rangle + \delta\left|\downarrow\right\rangle

where \gamma & \delta are complex numbers:

\therefore

\left\langle\Phi\right|\left|\Psi\right\rangle = \alpha \gamma^* + \beta \delta^* = 0

Not sure where to go from here, i must be missing something. anyone know what it is?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that if |\Phi\rangle is orthogonal to |\Psi\rangle, then so is c|\Phi\rangle for any complex number c. You can use this to scale away one of the coefficients in your expression for |\Phi\rangle and then solve for the other.
 
Not sure I'm following. I could just say that:

\alpha \gamma^* = -\beta \delta^*

then the following relationship would satisfy.

\gamma^* = \beta , \delta^* = -\alpha

so:
\left|\Phi\right\rangle = \beta\left|\uparrow\right\rangle - \alpha\left|\downarrow\right\rangle
 
Of course, that's one particular solution. fzero only said that for any complex c
|\Theta\rangle = c |\Phi\rangle also is orthogonal to |\Psi\rangle, which you could have used in your solution. But it isn't necessary.
 
Last edited:
knowlewj01 said:
Not sure I'm following. I could just say that:

\alpha \gamma^* = -\beta \delta^*

then the following relationship would satisfy.

\gamma^* = \beta , \delta^* = -\alpha

so:
\left|\Phi\right\rangle = \beta\left|\uparrow\right\rangle - \alpha\left|\downarrow\right\rangle

This should be

\left|\Phi\right\rangle = \beta^*\left|\uparrow\right\rangle - \alpha^*\left|\downarrow\right\rangle .

Note that

\left|\Phi\right\rangle = \beta^*\left( \left|\uparrow\right\rangle - \frac{\alpha^*}{\beta^*} \left|\downarrow\right\rangle \right),

so any multiple of

\left|\uparrow\right\rangle - \frac{\alpha^*}{\beta^*} \left|\downarrow\right\rangle

is orthogonal to |\Psi\rangle.

I just thought you were having algebra trouble, so starting with a state with \gamma=1 would make things easier. However, the fact that all vectors in the Hilbert space that differ only by a rescaling correspond to the same physical state is a fundamental concept.

The extra benefit of the state that you actually found though is that it's already normalized.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top