Find angle between planes (011) and (001)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerjer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Planes
jerjer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please help me!
Find angle between planes (011) and (001)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks spo much!
So according to that
to find the angle btw planes (011) and (001) in a cubic crystal (they are perpendicular) I need to normalize vectors.

Normalizing vectors:
ll v ll = sqrt( 0^2 +1^2+1^2)= sqrt(2)

llwll = sqrt (0^2 + 0^2 +1^2)= 1


v vector normalized:
x/1.41= 0/1.41= 0
y/1.41= 0.71
z/1.41= 0.71
v = 0.71j +0.71 k

w vector normalized:
x/1=0/1= 0
y/1=0/1= 0
z/1=1/1=1
w = k

v dot w= 0.71+0.71= 1.41

then, the angle theta between planes (011) and (001)
theta= v dot w/( llvll * llwll)
theta= inverse of cosine ( 1.41/( sqrt (2)) (sqrt(1))= 1.41/ sqrt (2) (1))
theta= inverse cosine (0.997)
theta= 4.4

DOes this make sense?
if I do inverse cosine of 0.997 I get theta= 4.4
but I do inverse cosine of 1 I get angle is 0

not sure what I'm doing wrong =( please some help!
 
(011) and (001) in a cubic crystal (they are perpendicular)
... how do you figure that?
v dot w= 0.71+0.71= 1.41
...don't think so. How did you get this result?

Note: It helps to explicitly keep √2 like that instead of converting to a decimal.
theta= v dot w/( llvll * llwll)
... yes - though ||v||=||w||=1 because you just normalized them didn't you?

To understand this approach:
The strategy is to find a vector perpendicular to each plane - related to the Miller indices how?
The angle between the planes is the angle between these two vectors.

I don't think you need to normalize them - just turns the dot product into the cosine of the angle.
The problem wants you to understand what the Miller notation is telling you.
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top