Find Center of Gravity Distances for Cut Discs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between the centers of gravity of a uniform disc before and after a smaller disc is cut from it. The mass of the larger disc is determined to be 4π, while the mass of the cut-out disc is π. Using the formula for center of gravity, the calculated distance between the two centers is 0.333m. Participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of this result, with one suggesting that the distance might actually be closer to 0.5m. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying principles of mass proportionality and geometry in solving the problem.
crossfacer
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A unifrom disc A of radius 2m is cut as shown in the image. The cut out is also a disc of radius 1m. Find the distance of the two center of gravity before and after the paper disc is cut.

http://crossfacer.com/circle.jpg

Homework Equations



x=m1x1/M+m2x2/M+...

The Attempt at a Solution



Mass of the disc is proportional to its area.
so mass of disc A=2^2pi=4pi units
mass of disc being cut out=1^2pi=pi units

Let x be the distance between the two centers of gravity.
(4pi-pi)(2-x)=(4pi)(2)-(2+1)(pi)
x=0.333m

This question is quite difficult for me. I don't have much confidence on my answer.:-p May anyone try it?:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks correct in my book.

You assume the homogeneity of the disc, and thus mass is proportional to the area. You know that together, they produce a center of gravity balanced at the center of disc A, and your equations reflect that.
 
mezarashi said:
Your answer looks correct in my book.

You assume the homogeneity of the disc, and thus mass is proportional to the area. You know that together, they produce a center of gravity balanced at the center of disc A, and your equations reflect that.

I feel like my answer is not correct:frown:. I guess x should be about 0.5.
 
well to check maybe you could use same methods with your new result and cut out identical hole in left half. I think it will end up in the middle again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top