Find charge field within coaxial cables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field E(r) for two coaxial cylinders, where the inner cylinder has a uniform charge per unit length λ and the outer cylinder, a conductor, has a charge of -2λ. The user is initially confused about how to express the enclosed charge in terms of the radius r, particularly for the region from 0 to a, and considers integrating to find E. After applying Gauss's law, they derive the expression E = λ/(2πrε₀), confirming the units are consistent. The conclusion affirms that the formula derived is correct and appropriately accounts for the coaxial configuration.
physninj
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


two very long coaxial cylinders. Inner has radius a and is solid with charge per unit length of λ. Volume is also uniform but not defined by a parameter. Outer is hollow with inner radius b and outer radius c. Outer cylinder is a conductor with charge per unit length of -2λ. Find E(r) for all r in terms of given parameters. you can also view attached picture.


Homework Equations


∫E.dA=qenclosed0


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm hung up right away on what to do with the inner radius from 0->a I've got the left side of the equation I think, but I don't know how to get qenclosed in terms of r, if it needs to be. I expect to integrate on that part. Anywho here's where I'm at.


E2∏rh=(1/ε0)∫dq

I've got λ=dq/dh where h represents the length of the cable being considered. All the examples seem to use charge density rather than charge per unit length, using this gives me:

E2∏rh=(1/ε0)∫λdh which is not in terms of r. I suppose I could still integrate it and cancel h on both sides, let me know if that's wrong.

E2∏rh=(λh/ε0)→E2∏r=(λ/ε0)

E(r)=λ/(2∏r*ε0)

Is this wrong for any reason? It doesn't feel right to not use the radius on the right side.
 

Attachments

  • cylinders.JPG
    cylinders.JPG
    33.9 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's consider the cable's length finite, L. The total charge of the inner cylinder would be Q = λL. Applying Gauss' theorem ∫E*dA = λL/ε°, since E is uniform and perpendicular to dA: E∫dA = λL/ε° <=> E(2πrL) = λL/ε° <=> E = λ/2πε°r.
The units on both sides are also ok, so your formula is right.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top