Find Christoffel symbols from metric

ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the non zero Christoffel symbols of the following metric

ds^2 = -dt^2 + \frac{a(t)^2}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 )

and find the non zero Christoffel symbols and Ricci tensor coefficients when k = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to use the Lagrangian method here, but it's so long since I was taught this I'm not sure if I'm even half right!

Starting with

\frac{d}{dλ} \frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = \frac{∂L}{∂q}

and for the case where q = t, so q' = t', I get

\frac{∂L}{∂q} = 0 + \frac{2a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)

\frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = -2\dot{t}

\frac{d}{dλ} \frac{∂L}{∂\dot{q}} = -2\ddot{t}

Putting it all together, I get

-2\ddot{t} = \frac{2a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)

or just

\ddot{t} + \frac{a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2} (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2) = 0

Compare this to

\ddot{X}^a + \Gamma^a_bc \dot{X}^a \dot{X}^b

to get

\Gamma^0_11 = \Gamma^0_22 = \Gamma^0_33 = \frac{a\dot{a}}{(1+\frac{k}{4}(x^2+y^2+z^2))^2}

This all looks OK to me, but I have worked through the rest of the problem using this approach and when I have to calculate Ricci tensor components I can't get the correct answers. I thought I should start by checking my work at the very beginning!

When k = 0 and the metric is much simplified, I get the following non-zero Christoffel symbols by using this approach

\Gamma^0_11 = \Gamma^0_22 = \Gamma^0_33 = a\dot{a}

\Gamma^1_11 = \Gamma^2_22 = \Gamma^3_33 = 2\frac{\dot{a}}{a}

and it's at this point that I get the Ricci tensor components all wrong (I know what they should be and I can't get the same answers). Is my Lagrangian method wrong, and have I missed out a load of non-zero Christoffel symbols?

(I didn't want to write out all my other Lagrangian working because this is my first go with LATEX and writing this post has taken me over an hour!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope that someone will have time to go through your calculation, as unfortunately I don't at the moment. But maybe you will already be helped if I point out that
\Gamma_{cab}<br /> =\frac12 \left(\frac{\partial g_{ca}}{\partial x^b} + \frac{\partial g_{cb}}{\partial x^a} - \frac{\partial g_{ab}}{\partial x^c} \right)<br /> = \frac12\, (g_{ca, b} + g_{cb, a} - g_{ab, c}) <br /> = \frac12\, \left(\partial_{b}g_{ca} + \partial_{a}g_{cb} - \partial_{c}g_{ab}\right) \,.<br />

That's the way I was taught to calculate them.
 
I have also used that method, and am trying to apply it this problem at the moment as "backup". However, because I have a 4D metric I have 40 possible christoffel symbols even allowing for symmetry. I thought the Lagrangian method would be quicker but I obviously haven't applied it correctly...
 
Why don't you use compuchip's standard formula just to spot check some of the coefficients that you calculated with the Lagrangian method? This might also give you a hint as to where you are making your mistake.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top