Find Coefficient of Friction (μ) on Cylinder with Rope and Cat/Mice Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter Super_Leunam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Rope
AI Thread Summary
To find the coefficient of friction (μ) for a cat pulling on a rope wrapped around a fixed cylinder, the relationship involves the belt friction equation. The tension on the cat's side of the rope is greater than on the mice's side due to static friction. This relationship can be derived by applying static equilibrium conditions to a small element of the rope and integrating over the contact angle of π/3. The solution indicates that μ is expressed as a function of the forces F and f, confirming that it is indeed an exponential function. Understanding these principles is essential for solving the problem effectively.
Super_Leunam
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
WOULD SOME1 HELP ME WITH THIS ANNOYING PROBLEM I CANT SOLVE :
a cat is wrapped around a fixed cylinder .theres friction between the rope and da cylinder with a coefficient of friction (mu) , the angle covered by the rope on the cylinder is (pi)/3 .assume a really thin rope. A cat is pulling on one end of the rope with a force F while 10 mice can just barely prevent from sliding by applying a total force of f . Find (mu) in function of F, f and the angle


i know the answer is has to do with an exponential


thanks

Manuel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
belt friction equation

Due to static friction with the cylinder, the tension on the cat end of the rope will be greater than on the mouse end. The relationship between the two tensions, the angle of contact, and mu is given by the so-called "belt friction equation". You can derive it by consider a small element of rope and applying static equilibrium conditions. Then integrate this over the full angle of contact.

Yes, it is an exponential function. :smile:
 
Super_Leunam said:
a cat is wrapped around a fixed cylinder.

Poor thing!

I like cats :frown:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top