Find current at high/low frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter Acuben
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Frequency
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the RMS current from a 45V power supply at different frequencies. For very high frequency, the RMS current is determined to be 225mA, while at very low frequency, it is 450mA. The key concept is that at high frequency, the impedance of the inductor can be approximated as infinite, while at low frequency, the capacitor's impedance is treated similarly. This simplification allows for the elimination of one loop in the circuit for each frequency case. Understanding these impedance behaviors is crucial for accurate calculations in AC circuits.
Acuben
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the rms current delievered by the 45v (rms) power supply when
a) the frequency is very large
and b) the frequency is very small.

answer: a) 225mA, b) 450mA

http://yfrog.com/jucurrentqg

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/1592/currentq.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Homework Equations


w= angular velocity (supposed to be omega)
L= inductor
C= capacitor
j= complex coefficent = sqrt(-1)
Zl= resistance of inductor
Zc= resistance of capacitor
Ztot= total resistance
R= resistance of resistor
P= Power

Xl=wL
Xc=1/wc
Zl=j*Xl
Zc=-j*Xc
Ztot= R + Zl + Zc = R + j(Xl-Xc)



The Attempt at a Solution



with frequency just being high, how am I supposed to get these exact numbers without letters/symbol for I? o.o I tried the calculation and omega did not cancel out either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The key idea is that in the case of very high or very low frequency, you can take the impedance (resistance) of the inductor and capacitor to be ~infinite, respectively. Does it make sense why that's true (as an approximation at least)?

In effect, this eliminates one of the two loops in the circuit for each case.
 
zhermes said:
The key idea is that in the case of very high or very low frequency, you can take the impedance (resistance) of the inductor and capacitor to be ~infinite, respectively. Does it make sense why that's true (as an approximation at least)?

In effect, this eliminates one of the two loops in the circuit for each case.

ah yes it does, at first I thought the resistance would skyrocket to infinity / 0
thank you
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K