Find Current at Point T in Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikolafmf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Current
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the current at point T in a circuit using known resistances and the current measured by an ammeter. The user applies Ohm's law and junction rule, establishing relationships between currents and resistances. They express concern about not using all resistance values in their calculations. The conversation confirms the user's approach but emphasizes the need to eliminate unknowns for a complete solution. Ultimately, the focus is on deriving the current at point T based on the established relationships.
nikolafmf
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The circuit is given as in the attachment. All resistors have known resistance and the inner resistance of the ammeter in known. The current which is measured by the ammeter is known. What is the current at the point T?

Homework Equations



Ohm's law: V=IR. Also at each junction, Iin=Iout.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let R0 be the resistance of the ammeter, I1 be the current at the point T, I2 be the current at resistor R2 and IA be the current at ammeter. It follows that IAR0=I2R2, from which I2 follows. Then I1=I2+IA.

That is what I think is true. But, given the values of resistances of all resistors which I didn't use in the calculation, I start to wonder if I miss something. Am I right or wrong?
 

Attachments

  • img024.jpg
    img024.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 423
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right so far, but not yet finished. You should end up with something like

IT = k.IA where k is a value you determine
 
NascentOxygen said:
You are right so far, but not yet finished. You should end up with something like

IT = k.IA where k is a value you determine

Isn't IT=I2+IA? (conservation of charge at the junction)
 
nikolafmf said:
Isn't IT=I2+IA? (conservation of charge at the junction)
Correct. But we don't know I2 so eliminate it from the equation.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Correct. But we don't know I2 so eliminate it from the equation.

But I2=IAR0/R2...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top