Find Eigen Values: Solve Char. Equation |A-#I| = 0 of Degree 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeroxff0000ff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigen values
zeroxff0000ff
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello everybody,

Consider '#' as lamda.
How to find roots(eigen values) of characteristic equation |A-#I| = 0.
I know how to find it it using numerical methods.
But can anyone please show me how to procced for degree 3 equations.

thanks and regards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks HallsofIvy.

just now i found some methods like factor and remainder theorem from the following link :
http://www.themathpage.com/aprecalc/factor-theorem.htm

can you please tell me advantage and disadvantage of using factor and reminder theorem.
 
I'm not sure what the remainder theorem is, but the factor theorem is usually what's used to solve cubics... if there's an easy root (like 1, 2, 0, -1) you can reduce the degree of your equation to a quadratic fairly easily, and from there solve for the remaining roots.

You can use the integer root theorem (on the website you posted) to figure out which integers are worth guessing. The advantage is that most problems will have a root that you can find in this way. The disadvantage is that if the polynomial doesn't have an integer root, you can't find any roots using this method. But it doesn't take a lot of time to try, so usually this is the best way to start.
 
the remainder theorem is the theorem from high school algebra that says the remainder of f(x) after dividing it by x-a, is f(a).
 
mathwonk said:
the remainder theorem is the theorem from high school algebra that says the remainder of f(x) after dividing it by x-a, is f(a).
And in particular, if f(a)= 0, the remainder is 0 so x-a is a factor of f(x).

It seems very strange to me that a person would be working with eigenvalues while not knowing how to solve polynomial equations by factoring!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top