Find f(t) given an inverse Laplace transform

JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find f(t).

Homework Equations



L^{-1}\left\{\frac{s}{s^{2}+4s+5}\right\}

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried completing the square to get to the solution and I ended up with:

L^{-1}\left\{\frac{s}{s^{2}+4s+5}\right\} =

L^{-1}\left\{\frac{s}{(s+2)^{2}+1}\right\}

Then, I used the inverse of a transform for cosine and the first translation theorum:

coskt = L^{-1}\left\{\frac{s}{(s^{2}+k^{2})}\right\}

L\left\{e^{at}f(t)\right\} = F(s-a)}

with a being -2 and k being 1 to get an answer of:

e^{-2t}cos(t)

However, I was wrong. The book had the following answer:

e^{-2t}cos(t)-2e^{-2t}sin(t)

My question is where does the -2e^{-2t}sin(t) come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that is all of the Laplace transform?
 
\frac{s}{(s+2)^2+1}=\frac{s+2 -2}{(s+2)^2+1}

now when you split that into two fractions, the one with s+2 in the numerator will give the cos term and the other will give the sin term, assuming I remember laplace transform correctly.
 
Good call, I knew that was missing but for some reason failed to mention it =(
 
rock.freak667 said:
\frac{s}{(s+2)^2+1}=\frac{s+2 -2}{(s+2)^2+1}

now when you split that into two fractions, the one with s+2 in the numerator will give the cos term and the other will give the sin term, assuming I remember laplace transform correctly.

Aaaaha! That looks like a Calc II trick coming back to light. The chapter in my Differential Equations book dealing with Laplace Transforms does talk a lot about fancy algebra techniques like partial fraction decomposition, rearranging constants, and completing the square. I just forgot this one in particular.

Thanks for the explanation.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top