Find ##\frac{dh}{dt}## in the problem involving related change.

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the rate of change of height, ##\frac{dh}{dt}##, using implicit differentiation in a related rates problem involving a cone's volume. The correct approach involves expressing the volume V as a function of height h alone by utilizing the linear relationship between radius r and height h, specifically ##r = \frac{5}{14}h##. The calculation shows that the total derivative of volume should be expressed using partial derivatives, not ordinary derivatives. The final result for ##\frac{dh}{dt}## is calculated to be approximately -0.1386. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying implicit differentiation and understanding the relationships between variables.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Related change- differentiation.
Find the problem here with solution. My interest is on part (a) only.
1656942385703.png
Solution;

1656942543621.png


1656942579508.png


The steps to solution are very much clear...the author made use of implicit differentiation. Now, would i be right to have;

##\dfrac{dV}{dt}=\dfrac{dV}{dh}\cdot \dfrac{dh}{dt}+ \dfrac{dV}{dr}\cdot \dfrac{dr}{dt}##

##-2=\dfrac{1}{3}π×\left[\dfrac{5}{14} h\right]^2\dfrac{dh}{dt}+\dfrac{2}{3}π ×\left[\dfrac{5}{14} h\right]h\dfrac{dr}{dt}##

We know that ##r=\dfrac{5}{14} h,## therefore ##\dfrac{dr}{dt}=\dfrac{5}{14}\dfrac{dh}{dt}##

##-2=\dfrac{1}{3}π×4.5918\dfrac{dh}{dt}+\dfrac{2}{3}π×12.857×\left[\dfrac{5}{14} h\right]h\dfrac{dr}{dt}##

##-2=4.8084\dfrac{dh}{dt}+9.6170\dfrac{dh}{dt}##

##-2=14.4254 \dfrac{dh}{dt}##

##\dfrac{dh}{dt}=-0.1386##

Your thoughts...i hope i did not just go round and round on the implicit approach...but hey that's how i think on this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
The steps to solution are very much clear...the author made use of implicit differentiation. Now, would i be right to have;
##\dfrac{dv}{dt}=\dfrac{dv}{dh}\cdot \dfrac{dh}{dt}+ \dfrac{dv}{dr}\cdot \dfrac{dr}{dt}##
##-2=\dfrac{1}{3}π\cdot \left[\dfrac{5}{14} h\right]^2⋅\dfrac{dh}{dt}+\dfrac{2}{3}π\cdot \left[\dfrac{5}{14} h\right]⋅h⋅\dfrac{dr}{dt}##
Certainly volume V is a function of both r and h, but due to the fact that every vertical cross-section of the cone is a triangle, it's much more convenient (and a lot easier) to treat r as a linear function of h (or vice versa), which makes V a function of a single variable.

Later edit: Another problem with your approach is that you're given neither dr/dt nor dh/dt. In what I described in the previous paragraph, the text you quoted actually gives the linear relationship between h and r; namely, ##r = \frac 5{14}h##. By replacing r in the equation for V for the cone, V can be written as a function of h alone.

Nits:
  • Your total derivative above, ##\dfrac{dv}{dt}## should be written in terms of the partial derivatives of volume with respect to r and h respectively. That is, in terms of ##\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}## and ##\frac{\partial V}{\partial h}##, not as ordinary derivatives.
  • Stylewise, V is traditionally used for volume while v (lowercase) is used for velocity.
 
Last edited:
Hey @Mark44 ...i've been busy marking scripts as an Examiner. Hope all well...
 
Last edited:
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...