Find kinetic energy from center of mass.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating kinetic energy for two automobiles treated as a system. The translational energy of the center of mass was found to be 345,600 J, with the total kinetic energy calculated as 721,200 J. Participants debated the kinetic energy in a reference frame moving with the center of mass, with confusion about whether this energy would be zero. It was clarified that to find the kinetic energy in the center of mass frame, one must calculate the velocities of each automobile relative to the center of mass and sum their respective kinetic energies. The correct approach involves using the velocities of the bodies in relation to the center of mass frame to arrive at the accurate kinetic energy value.
Sneakatone
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
two automobiles each of mass 1200kg traveling a the same direction. Speed of one automobile is 29.0 m/s and the other is 19 m/s. Regard these automobiles as a system of two particles.

a)what is translational energy of center of mass?
I found velocity at center of mass which is 24 m/s and plugged it in K=mv^2 and ended up with 345600 J.

b) what is the total kinetic energy?
(0.5*1200*29^2)+(0.5*1200*19^2)=721200

c) what is the kinetic energy in a reference frame moving with the center of mass?
Im guessing that you subtract part b with part a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to find the velocities of each of the objects in the CM reference frame, plug them in mv2/2 and add them.
 
504600+216600=721200
which is what I have for part b
so would the reference frame be zero for part c?
 
Sneakatone said:
so would the reference frame be zero for part c?

I don't understand your statement. How can a reference frame be 0?
 
I thought the total-translational energy gives kinetic energy in a reference frame (part c).
But I guess not, I think I should just use k=.5mv^2 but with velocity of the center of mass.
 
In part c, since the frame is moving with the center of mass(I'm assuming 0 relative velocity here between the frame and the CM as the question doesn't say otherwise) it is essentially the frame of the center of mass and thus the kinetic energy should be the same as part b)

Does your source say the same?
 
source dosent have a name.

so are you saying that part c would be zero?
 
Sunil Simha said:
In part c, since the frame is moving with the center of mass(I'm assuming 0 relative velocity here between the frame and the CM as the question doesn't say otherwise) it is essentially the frame of the center of mass and thus the kinetic energy should be the same as part b)

Does your source say the same?

Sorry. My bad. Strike that.
Sneakatone said:
so are you saying that part c would be zero?

I'm not saying it is zero.
Find the velocities of the objects relative to the center of mass frame. Then add their respective kinetic energies.

Sneakatone said:
504600+216600=721200
which is what I have for part b
so would the reference frame be zero for part c?

This is wrong. Get the velocities w.r.t. the CM frame.
 
(19*1200+29*1200)/2400=24m/s
if I plugg it in 0.*1200*24=345600 J is that correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The velocity of the bodies w.r.t. the center of mass frame of reference is vbody-vCM (Vector difference). Now try solving part c)

P.S. If velocity of a body is vBody in A in one frame of reference, say frame A and there is a frame B which is moving at velocity vB with respect to frame A, then the velocity of the body in frame B is
vBody in B = vBody in A - vB.
 
Back
Top