Find linear combination of 16 Γ matrices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around expressing specific matrices, M = (σ_μυ)(γ_5), (σ_μυ)(σ^μυ), and (γ^α)(σ_μυ)(γ_α), as linear combinations of 16 given Γ matrices. The coefficients for this linear combination are determined using the trace formula c_J = (1/4) Tr (M (inverse of Γ_J)). The user struggles with understanding the explicit forms of σ^μυ and the inverses of the Γ matrices, indicating a lack of confidence in linear algebra. They also realize that the property (Γ_J)^2 = ±I can help in finding the inverses. The thread highlights the need for assistance in linear algebra concepts related to these matrix manipulations.
qaok
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Any spinor matrix can be expressed in a set of 16 linearly independent matrices. In the lecture the 16 Γ_J matrices (J=1 to 16) given are I, γ^0,1,2,3, σ^μυ, (γ^μ)(γ_5), iγ_5. I was asked to express
M = (σ_μυ)(γ_5), (σ_μυ)(σ^μυ), (γ^α)(σ_μυ)(γ_α)
in terms of the 16 given Γ matrices.


Homework Equations


The coefficients of the linear combination of the 16 matrices is
c_J = (1/4) Tr (M (inverse of Γ_J))



The Attempt at a Solution


I'd been trying to find the explicit forms σ^μυ but did not find any table. What I found is that the 16 linearly independent matrices can also be the products of γ^0,1,2,3. But I think I was not supposed to find σ^μυ in terms of products of γ^0,1,2,3 then get the inverse of σ^μυ explicitly.

I'm really bad in linear algebra and have no idea about the inverses of the 16 matrices and the properties of the traces of their inverses. Can anyone please help me? Thank you.

I did not use LaTeX because it did not look right when previewing. Sorry about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't know that (Γ_J)^2 = ±I. So now the inverse of Γ_J can be found.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top