Find mechanical energy lost when a cyclist goes down a hill

AI Thread Summary
The cyclist accelerates from 5 m/s to 12 m/s while descending a hill, resulting in a calculated work done by gravity of 4463 J. To find the mechanical energy lost due to air resistance and friction, one must consider the difference between the total mechanical energy at the top and bottom of the hill, including potential energy. The discussion highlights that without energy losses, the exchange between potential and kinetic energy would be ideal. However, since energy is lost to friction and air resistance, the work done must account for these factors. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating energy losses in such scenarios.
Phys121VIU
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A cyclist has a speed of 5 m/s when she beings to coast down a hill, as shown in the figure. At the bottom of the hill, her speed has increased to 12m/s. the mass of the cyclist plus bicycle is 75kg.

a) Calculate the work done by gravity on the cyclist and bicycle.

b) Calculate the mechanical energy lost because of air resistance and friction. Explain.


I found the work done(part a):

Work = ΔK = Kf - Ki

Work = [(1/2)mvf2 - (1/2)mvi2]

Work = [(1/2)(75kg)(12m/s)2 - (1/2)(75kg)(5m/s)2]

Work = (5400 - 937.5)Nm = J

Work = 4463 J


What I don't understand is how to find the air resistance and friction..i just need an idea of where to start


Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Photo 2012-10-17 10 30 34 PM.jpg
    Photo 2012-10-17 10 30 34 PM.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 524
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the calculated work used for?

What speed would cyclist have when there would be no need to do work?
 
Gravity? I'm not sure what your asking..
 
Let's say there would be no need to do any work. In that way, you would only have exchange between kinetic and potential energy. On top of the hill, your PE would be max and your KE would be min. On bottom of the hill, your KE would be max and your PE would be min. But such exchange is not possible because you have some losses and you need to do some work. Now I see that you neglected the potential energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top