MHB Is \( n \) Equal to 23 in the Given Trigonometric Product Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation \( (1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n \) leads to the determination of \( n \). By using the identity \( 1 + \tan(45^\circ - k) = \frac{2}{1 + \tan k} \), pairs of terms can be simplified to yield \( (1 + \tan k)(1 + \tan(45^\circ - k)) = 2 \). This results in 22 pairs contributing to the product, giving \( (1+\tan 1)(1+\tan 2)\cdots(1+\tan 44) = 2^{22} \). Including \( 1 + \tan 45 = 2 \) leads to the final product being \( 2^{23} \). Therefore, \( n \) is determined to be 23.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given that $$(1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n$$, find $n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Given that $$(1+\tan 1^{\circ})(1+\tan 2^{\circ})\cdots(1+\tan 45^{\circ})=2^n$$, find $n$.

Note k in degrees and degree symbol not mentioned

tan (45-k)) = (tan 45- tank )/( 1+ tan 45 tan k)
= ( 1- tan k)/ (1 + tan k)
So 1+ tan (45-k) = ( 1+ tan k + 1 – tan k) / ( 1+ tan k) = 2/(1+ tan k)
Or (1 + tan (45-k))(1+ tan k) = 2

So (1 + tan 1) ( 1+ tan 44) = 2
(1+ tan 2)(1 + tan 43) = 2
( 1 + tan 22)(1+ tan 23) = 2

Hence (1+tan 1)( 1+ tan 2) … ( 1 + tan 44) = 2^22

As 1 + tan 45 = 2 so multiplying we get
(1+tan 1)( 1+ tan 2) … ( 1 + tan 44)( 1+ tan 45) = 2^23
hence n = 23
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top