Find Out if Diffraction Grating Can Resolve Wavelengths 5800 & 5802 Angstroms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffraction grating problem involving the resolution of two specific wavelengths, 5800 and 5802 Angstroms. The original poster presents a scenario where light is incident on a grating, and they seek to determine the number of lines per cm and whether the grating can resolve the given wavelengths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the number of lines per cm for the diffraction grating and questions the correctness of their calculations. They also inquire about how to determine the resolving power of the grating for the specified wavelengths. Other participants suggest comparing angular separations and the resolution power of the human eye, while some express uncertainty about the relevance of this information.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various methods to assess the grating's resolving power. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, and some participants are questioning the assumptions made regarding the setup and the necessary calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the beam of light is inclined at an angle of 30 degrees, which may affect the calculations related to the path length and resolution. There is also mention of varying sources regarding the resolution power of the human eye, indicating a lack of clarity in the problem's requirements.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
A beam of light is incident normally on a diffraction grating of width 2cm. It is found that at 30 degrees, the nth order diffraction maximum for \lambda_1 = 5 \times 10^{-5}cm is superimposed on the (n + 1)th order of \lambda_2 = 4 \times 10^{-5}cm.

1]How many lines per cm does the grating have?
2]Find out whether the first order spectrum from such a grating can be used to resolve the wavelengths \lambda_3 = 5800 Angstrom units & \lambda_4 = 5802 Angstrom units.

My work:

1]If N ruling occupy a total width W, then slit width d=W/N.

d\sin \theta = n\lambda_1 = (n+1)\lambda_2

{2\over N}{1\over 2} = n\lambda_1 = (n+1)\lambda_2

5000n= 4000(n+1)[/tex] (in Angstrom units).<br /> <br /> So, I got: n = 4; which I substituted in the first equation and I got the total number of rulings <b>N = 0.5 x 10<sup>4</sup></b><br /> <br /> So, number of rulings per cm is: N/Total width = N/2 = 0.25 x 10<sup>4</sup><br /> <br /> Is this part correct?<br /> <br /> 2]For this part, I can find the difference between the 2 wavelengths:<br /> <br /> \Delta \lambda = 2 Angstrom units.<br /> How do I determine whether the grating has good resolving power or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think for your scond one you need to find the distance between n=1 nodal lines for each of the wavelengths and compare with the power of resolution of the human eye (look it up)
 
You mean I have to find the angular separation between the two lines in order to determine whether the resolution is good or not?
 
Hey someone please help me here...I am unable to get any breakthroughs. Different sources give different resolution power for human eye and I don't think it is needed in this problem. Is there some other way of determining whether the resolution is good or not?
 
In this problem, the beam of light is inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the grating.

So,

d\sin \theta = n\lambda_1

won't be right as you will have to factor in the difference in path length because the beam of light is inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the grating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K