Find Resistance b/w 2 Ends: Resnik & Halliday, Vol2, Pg723, Fig31-41

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aditya3003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equivalent resistance between two points in a circuit depicted in Resnik & Halliday, Vol2, Pg723, Fig31-41. The user struggles with applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and is only familiar with calculating total resistance in series and parallel configurations. Suggestions include utilizing "Y-Delta transformation" to simplify the circuit and noting that one resistor can be removed due to symmetry, allowing for easier calculations. Understanding basic circuit laws is emphasized as crucial for solving the problem effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational knowledge in circuit analysis for accurate resistance calculations.
Aditya3003
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find to resistance and am having problem as I do not know KCL's. All I know is the total resistance in series or parallel. I have attached the image. Find resistance b/w the 2 ends.

Homework Equations


If you have Resnik & Halliday open page 723(Vol2). and see figure 31-41. My question is same with r = 20ohm & R=10ohm.

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
Aditya3003 said:

Homework Statement


I need to find to resistance and am having problem as I do not know KCL's. All I know is the total resistance in series or parallel. I have attached the image. Find resistance b/w the 2 ends.


Homework Equations


If you have Resnik & Halliday open page 723(Vol2). and see figure 31-41. My question is same with r = 20ohm & R=10ohm.

If you don't know the basic circuit laws it's going to be difficult to proceed; All you can do is try to apply "canned" formulas. Hint: Look up "Y-Delta transformation".
 
One resistor has zero current inside due to symmetry, you can remove it and use your formulas for resistors in series/parallel afterwards.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top