Find the Acute Angle Formed by Line y-(sqrt(3))x+1=0 & x-Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Agent_J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the acute angle formed by the line y - (sqrt(3))x + 1 = 0 and the x-axis. The line can be simplified to y = sqrt(3)x, making it easier to analyze. A point on the line is determined to be (sqrt(3), 3), forming a right triangle with the x-axis. The tangent of the angle is calculated as tan(t) = 3/sqrt(3), leading to an angle of 60 degrees or pi/3 radians. The gradient of the line directly correlates to the tangent of the angle with the x-axis, confirming the solution's validity.
Agent_J
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Find the acute angle that is formed by the line y - (sqrt(3)) x + 1 = 0 and the x-axis.

better picture here:
http://members.rogers.com/agentj/images/math.jpg

I am totally lost with this one. It was from my old trigonometry test, but I don't see the relavance of the question to trigonometry :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you know the gradient and that's tan of the angle you want
 
so how would I start tackling this question :redface: ?
 
What this is basically is polar coordinates.

We solve for y, and get y = sqrt(3) - 1. It's easier to do if the graph intersects the origin. Because this is just a straight line, the -1 can be removed from the equation and it won't change the angle to the x-axis. So, our equation is...

y = sqrt(3)x

Next, we need to get a point. Just to keep nice even answers, I'll use x = sqrt(3).

y = sqrt(3)x
y = sqrt(3)*sqrt(3)
y = 3

So, a point is (sqrt(3), 3).

Now, what you do is basically, it makes a triangle. The base (x) is sqrt(3), and the height (y) is 3.

We use our SOH-CAH-TOA trig functions, and see that tan = opp/adj. The opposite angle is the height/y, and the adjacent angle is the base/x.

I'm just using the letter t for now to make things easier...

tan t = 3/sqrt(3)
t = arctan(3/sqrt(3))

t = 60 degrees, or pi/3 if you're working in radians

NOTE: I always seem to goof something up whenever I try to help here, so someone else should just double check what I did.
 
apart from the fact that you made it far more complicated than it needs to be, that is correct.

y=mx+c

then the gradient is m and that is tan of the angle of the slope, that's all.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top