Find the amount of a vector acting in the direction of another vector.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slartibartfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Vector
AI Thread Summary
To find the component of a force acting along a tilted axis, the discussion emphasizes using the parallelogram rule and sine law, as suggested by the textbook and professor. The original poster questions this approach, believing that using right triangles would yield the same result. They demonstrate an alternative method of decomposing the force into parallel and perpendicular components using vector operations. The conversation highlights the validity of both methods but leans towards the mathematical foundation of vector decomposition for clarity. Ultimately, understanding how to correctly resolve vectors is essential in statics problems.
Slartibartfest
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a problem in a statics class that asks to find the component of a force acting along an axis seen here http://i.imgur.com/aZ1vMIu.jpg?1.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The book and my professor say to use the parallelogram rule and then use sine law to find the solution like this http://i.imgur.com/dipBfjq.jpg?1 , but I do not see why it should be done this way; I understand that the axis are tilted slightly but I would think in order to solve this problem you would still use a right triangle rather than the parallelogram rule like this http://i.imgur.com/3Pazp0l.jpg?1 and I can turn the force into a vector and then find the component of the force onto the axis and I get the same answer that I would if I used right triangles like this http://i.imgur.com/naGp3us.jpg?1 . Now I'm assuming my professor and the book are correct(even though I would love to prove them wrong) so why would I use a parallelogram instead of a right triangle?
Also here is the answer in the back of the book http://i.imgur.com/5k4UaLC.jpg?1 .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your images are way too large. Please resize them to about 800 X 600 and repost them so that people will be able to see them without having to scroll across and from top to bottom.
 
Much better! Thank you!
 
Slartibartfest said:

Homework Statement



I have a problem in a statics class that asks to find the component of a force acting along an axis seen here http://i.imgur.com/aZ1vMIu.jpg?1.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The book and my professor say to use the parallelogram rule and then use sine law to find the solution like this http://i.imgur.com/dipBfjq.jpg?1 , but I do not see why it should be done this way; I understand that the axis are tilted slightly but I would think in order to solve this problem you would still use a right triangle rather than the parallelogram rule like this http://i.imgur.com/3Pazp0l.jpg?1 and I can turn the force into a vector and then find the component of the force onto the axis and I get the same answer that I would if I used right triangles like this http://i.imgur.com/naGp3us.jpg?1 . Now I'm assuming my professor and the book are correct(even though I would love to prove them wrong) so why would I use a parallelogram instead of a right triangle?
Also here is the answer in the back of the book http://i.imgur.com/5k4UaLC.jpg?1 .

If you have vectors ##\vec{u}## and ##\vec{v}##, you can decompose ##\vec{u}## into a component ##\vec{u}_{||}## that is parallel to ##\vec{v}## and a component ##\vec{u}_{\perp}## that is perpendicular to ##\vec{v}##. That is,
\vec{u} = \vec{u}_{||} + \vec{u}_{\perp}
\vec{u}_{||} = \left(\frac{\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v} }{\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}} \right) \vec{v}
\vec{u}_{\perp} = \vec{u} - \vec{u}_{||}<br /> = \vec{u}- \left( \frac{\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v} }{\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}} \right) \vec{v}
So, if you can compute the inner product of ##\vec{u}## and ##\vec{v}## you are almost done. This works in any number of dimensions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top