Find the angle of a force by means of graphic solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a beam fastened at point C and supported by an axially loaded bar BD, with a load F acting at point A. The objective is to find the forces in the bar and at point C, as well as the angle of the force at C using a graphic solution method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss drawing the line of action for the forces and constructing a vector triangle based on known forces. There is uncertainty regarding the placement of force BD and how to determine the angle at point C. Some participants question the interpretation of the angle's definition and the lengths used in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's approaches. There is a focus on clarifying the relationships between the forces and the geometry involved, as well as the correct identification of angles and lengths relevant to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the perspective in the provided figures and the need to maintain the correct relationships between forces while constructing the triangle. There is also mention of using the Pythagorean theorem, although its relevance is debated.

kaffekjele
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam ABC is fastened in C and is supported by the axially loaded bar BD. There is a load F working in A.
Disregard any friction.
Use the given measurements to find the force in the axially loaded bar BD, the force in C and the angle of the force in C by means of graphic solution.

Original figure can be found here: http://i45.tinypic.com/14b2m9d.jpg

Homework Equations



The line of action of the three forces must meet in one point for equilibrium to occur.



The Attempt at a Solution



http://i46.tinypic.com/34ih0y0.jpg

What I've done is draw the line of action for the forces working through F, B and C until they meet in a single point.
I've then drawn the resulting vector triangle by starting with force F since that's the only one that is known. After that I continued the triangle by displacing the force working through C and then moved the force BD to complete the triangle. (I'm not sure if this is correct, so feel free to comment.)

I'm not sure how to find the angle of the force working through point C. I assume they mean the angle of the force relative to the beam, but I'm not sure.
Anyway, what I've tried is to use invers tangens 2,2 divided by 3,3(by means of using the measurements from the original figure) which gave an angle of 33,7 degrees, but this was not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kaffekjele said:
What I've done is draw the line of action for the forces working through F, B and C until they meet in a single point.
So far so good. Call the intersection point P.
I've then drawn the resulting vector triangle by starting with force F since that's the only one that is known. After that I continued the triangle by displacing the force working through C and then moved the force BD to complete the triangle.
I don't understand how you decided where to move BD to. It doesn't look parallel to the original BD. Maybe it's just the perspective in the image.
I'm not sure how to find the angle of the force working through point C. I assume they mean the angle of the force relative to the beam, but I'm not sure.
Yes, it's unclear - it could mean angle from vertical.
Anyway, what I've tried is to use invers tangens 2,2 divided by 3,3(by means of using the measurements from the original figure) which gave an angle of 33,7 degrees, but this was not correct.
Those are the wrong lengths. You want the angle PCA; which lengths tell you the tangent?
 
haruspex said:
I don't understand how you decided where to move BD to. It doesn't look parallel to the original BD. Maybe it's just the perspective in the image.

It's not parallell to the orignial BD, no. I moved it because I didn't see any other way to complete the triangle without having to move some of the other forces as well. I looked at an example in my coursebook and it seemed this was an ok thing to do, but I might have gone about it the wrong way so feel free to comment.

haruspex said:
Those are the wrong lengths. You want the angle PCA; which lengths tell you the tangent?

Uhm. I fear I'm about to feel stupid now, but I don't see any other way. I have the length of the beam (2,1+1,2= 3,3m) which I guess would be my adjacent side, and the length between fastenings C and D(2,2m) which would be my opposite side.

In addition you could use the Pythagoream theorem to calculate the length of the axially bar BD, but I don't see how that would be of any use since the forces are displaced.
 
kaffekjele said:
It's not parallell to the orignial BD, no.
It needs to be. You can change the line of action to create the triangle, but the lengths must relate to the magnitudes and the directions must be preserved.
I have the length of the beam (2,1+1,2= 3,3m) which I guess would be my adjacent side, and the length between fastenings C and D(2,2m) which would be my opposite side.
But using those lengths will give you the tangent of angle CAD, whereas you want angle PCA. Do you see that? So you need to find the length AP. You can get that from finding two similar triangles.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K