Find the angula aceleration of the pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hernaner28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a pulley system with two attached disks and two hanging masses. The initial calculations yield an incorrect angular acceleration due to the assumption that tension equals the weight of the hanging masses. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the inertia of both blocks and using a system of equations to account for the forces acting on each mass and the pulley. A key point is the need to correctly assign torque signs based on the direction of rotation, which ultimately leads to the correct result of approximately 21.3 rad/s². The conversation highlights the complexity of kinematics problems and the necessity of adhering to consistent conventions in calculations.
Hernaner28
Messages
261
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=48979&stc=1&d=1341791741.jpg

The pulley consists of two disks which are both attached to each other. The total moment of inertia is:
\displaystyle I=23\times {{10}^{-4}}Kg\cdot {{m}^{2}}
You also know that:

\displaystyle \begin{align}<br /> &amp; {{m}_{1}}=0.8 \\ <br /> &amp; {{m}_{2}}=0.5Kg \\ <br /> &amp; {{R}_{1}}=0.025m \\ <br /> &amp; {{R}_{2}}=0.060m \\ <br /> &amp; \\ <br /> \end{align}

Find the angular aceleration of the pulley.

Homework Equations


Torque.
\displaystyle \tau =I\alpha =F\cdot r

The Attempt at a Solution



\displaystyle \tau ={{m}_{1}}g{{R}_{1}}-{{m}_{2}}g{{R}_{2}}=\frac{-49}{500}=I\alpha

\displaystyle \alpha \approx 42.6

But the corect option is 21.3, that is the half of what I got. Why?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • pullley.jpg
    pullley.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 488
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that the tension in each rope equals the weight of the hanging mass. Not so. You'll need equations for each mass as well as the pulley.
 
This is one of the most annoying kinematics problems

The issue you are having is that you are not considering the inertia of the two blocks. Your teacher is cold hearted to make the answer you perceived correct as a possible choice and the fact it is seemingly twice the correct answer is misleading. He most likely evaluated the problem the same way you did and made it an answer choice. Using a system of three equations and one simple identity, you can solve for alpha.


an = \alpharn
\sumF1 = m1a1 = T1 - m1g
\sumF2 = m2a2 = T2 - m2g
\sum\tau = I\alpha = T2r2 - T1r1

If you correctly substitute and solve for alpha, you will see what your teacher expects you to do.
 
Last edited:
Doc Al said:
You are assuming that the tension in each rope equals the weight of the hanging mass. Not so. You'll need equations for each mass as well as the pulley.
Aham... so:

\displaystyle {{m}_{1}}{{a}_{1}}=-{{m}_{1}}g+{{T}_{1}}
\displaystyle {{m}_{2}}{{a}_{2}}=-{{m}_{2}}g+{{T}_{2}}

Where:

\displaystyle {{a}_{1}}=\alpha {{R}_{1}}
\displaystyle {{a}_{2}}=\alpha {{R}_{2}}

\displaystyle \tau ={{T}_{1}}{{R}_{1}}-{{T}_{2}}{{R}_{2}}=I\alpha

Is this well done?

darthfunnybot said:
The issue you are having is that you are not considering the rotational inertia of the entire system.

That's not right. What has that to do? The only thing which rotates is the pulley. The mistake is what Doc Al said.

Thanks!
 
Hmph

Sorry, while I was editing my post you managed to correct me! Either way we both agree. This problem is as good as solved.

But I disagree with you about the pulley being the only rotating object. The shortcut to solve this problem is to perceive the inertia of the two masses to be at a constant respective radial distance.
This gives:
\sum\tau = I\alpha = (0.0023 + m1r12 + m2r22)\alpha

Shortcuts can be dangerous, but they are very helpful when you learn to identify them properly. It is not always practical to use a system of three equation on a multiple choice test(I cannot stand these), so you sometimes need to devise simpler, specific methods.
As long as you know the full blown kinematics solution, no harm no foul.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, now I see you've written the same I did!

Anyway, I get:

\displaystyle \tau =({{m}_{1}}\alpha {{R}_{1}}+{{m}_{1}}g){{R}_{1}}-({{m}_{2}}\alpha {{R}_{2}}+{{m}_{2}}g){{R}_{2}}=I\alpha
\displaystyle I\alpha ={{m}_{1}}\alpha {{R}_{1}}^{2}+{{m}_{1}}g{{R}_{1}}-{{m}_{1}}\alpha {{R}_{1}}^{2}-{{m}_{1}}g{{R}_{1}}

And solving for alpha I don't get the correct result... I will check this out again

** Now I see you say I have to consider the inertia of the two blocks but I don't know why! They are not rotating, their radious are not constant. I don't even know the length of the rope! ... The hanging mass only exert a force producing a torque, that's all.

thanks
 
Last edited:
I'm not getting the correct result with that equations. Something has to be wrong. I get alpha is 27.3
 
I believe your error is you forget to consider that a1 and a2 are vectors of opposite direction. Specifically, you are subtracting the term (0.8kg)(0.0025m)2 when in fact you should be adding this quantity.
 


darthfunnybot said:
The issue you are having is that you are not considering the inertia of the two blocks. Your teacher is cold hearted to make the answer you perceived correct as a possible choice and the fact it is seemingly twice the correct answer is misleading. He most likely evaluated the problem the same way you did and made it an answer choice. Using a system of three equations and one simple identity, you can solve for alpha.


an = \alpharn
\sumF1 = m1a1 = T1 - m1g
\sumF2 = m2a2 = T2 - m2g
\sum\tau = I\alpha = T2r2 - T1r1


If you correctly substitute and solve for alpha, you will see what your teacher expects you to do.


\sumF1 = m1a1 = T1 - m1g - AntiClockwise

\sumF2 = m2a2 = T2 - m2g- Clockwise
 
  • #10
Yes, it would be sth like this:

\displaystyle \tau =({{m}_{1}}\alpha {{R}_{1}}+{{m}_{1}}g){{R}_{1}}-({{m}_{2}}\alpha {{R}_{2}}+{{m}_{2}}g){{R}_{2}}=I\alpha

But not getting the result... still checking. This is tricky...
 
  • #11
Hernaner28 said:
Yes, it would be sth like this:

\displaystyle \tau =({{m}_{1}}\alpha {{R}_{1}}+{{m}_{1}}g){{R}_{1}}-({{m}_{2}}\alpha {{R}_{2}}+{{m}_{2}}g){{R}_{2}}=I\alpha

But not getting the result... still checking. This is tricky...

The pulley should be in one direction. Shouldn't one in clockwise and the other anticlockwise.
 
  • #12
Those are the signs of the torques. I considered a positive torque as clockwise and negative anticlockwise, and that's the formula I get. Anyway, that shouldn't be a problem since I'm seeking the module of the angular aceleration
 
  • #13
If you're taking anticlockwise direction,
T2=m2g-m2a
T1=m1g+m1a

Since taking anticlockwise direction,
Anticlockwise torque>clockwise torque
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ahhh nice! That was the mistake... didn't considered the sign of the angular direction!

Thanks I got the exact result which is:

\displaystyle \frac{490}{23}\approx 21.3043...

Thanksss!
 
  • #15
That's nice.
Remember the convention you take and stick to it.
Also on projectile where the convention of positive and negative is taken.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top