Find the capacitance of C3 and its charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the capacitance and charge of capacitor C3, emphasizing the correct formula for voltage, V = Q/C. Participants clarify that this formula is essential for solving part (a) of the problem. It is noted that part (b) can be approached without needing the answer from part (a), simplifying the calculations. Additionally, there is a suggestion to improve the presentation of the homework pages using matrices and determinants. Overall, the conversation revolves around correcting misunderstandings and enhancing problem-solving strategies.
Kelsi_Jade
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From the textbook:
upload_2017-3-27_9-20-2.png


Homework Equations

/ 3. The Attempt at a Solution
My attempt at the solution: looking to fix my issues and help correcting my work.[/B]
upload_2017-3-27_9-20-24.png

upload_2017-3-27_9-21-49.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have used incorrect formula for voltage across capacitor.

You need to write the voltage across capacitor in terms of charge and capacitance.
 
Should be V=Q/C?
 
Kelsi_Jade said:
Should be V=Q/C?
Yes.
 
So, would this be accurate?

upload_2017-3-27_17-19-31.png
 
I think that's right for (a). Much better than before. :approve:

For (b) you don't actually need the answer to (a). You might be able to say it off back of head. :oldwink:

After which calculation of (a) is a bit simpler.

Here Matrices and determiants is how you can make pages like yours look better.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top