Find the charge distribution from the given E-field (spherical)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the charge distribution from a given electric field in a spherical context. Participants are exploring the relationship between static charge distributions and electric fields, particularly focusing on the conditions for the electric field to be considered legitimate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the legitimacy of the electric field based on its curl and whether it meets the criteria for being conservative. There are attempts to confirm calculations related to the charge density and divergence of the electric field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing calculations and corrections to previous statements. Some participants are questioning their own assumptions and calculations, while others are confirming interpretations of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions and properties of conservative fields, as well as discrepancies in calculations related to the charge density. Participants are also clarifying the coordinate system being used in the problem.

goohu
Messages
53
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
see picture
Relevant Equations
1) ##\nabla \times E = 0##

2) ##\rho = \epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot E##
a) Static charge distribution should result in a static electric field? Legitimacy should be checked with curl of E = 0?

b) Using the second equation should give is the answer?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 175
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not proceed as if you got a yes and a yes as answers and see what comes out !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I already did , I just wanted to confirm.

For:

a) ## \nabla \times E = (0, 0, -5)##. So it is legitimate since it is not 0.

b) ## \rho = \epsilon_0 \alpha e^{-\lambda R} (\lambda R + 1) \frac{1}{ R^2} ##
 
Don't understand a) at all ... 🤔
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Actually I recalculated the curl of E and I got it to 0.

This is actually the condition for the E-field to be legitimate (since it is conservative).

From my textbook I've learned that a field that is not conservative is not an E-field.

Sorry about the confusion.
 
goohu said:
From my textbook I've learned that a field that is not conservative is not an E-field
Slight (but important) correction: A field that is not conservative is not a static(time independent) E-field
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and goohu
Slight correction (i think) for b) of post #3 i am getting the parenthesis as## (1-\lambda R)## instead of ##(1+\lambda R)##
 
I missed a minus sign. I got it to ## \rho = -\epsilon_0 \alpha e^{-\lambda R} (\lambda R + 1) \frac{1}{ R^2} ##

using quotient rule
 
well I seem to calculate $$\epsilon_0\alpha\frac{1}{R^2}\frac{\partial (Re^{-\lambda R})}{\partial R}$$ where do i go wrong?
 
  • #10
Seems I am wrong , I calculated ##\nabla E ## instead of ## \nabla \cdot E##
 
  • #12
Yeah I think you got it right. Its in spherical coordinates, I attached the picture of the problem in the opening post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
871
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K