Find the Distance and Sign of Charge Q for F1 = F2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kathi201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Sign
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the distance and sign of an unknown charge Q placed between two existing charges, Charge 1 (+1.6E-6C) and Charge 2 (-4.8E-6C). The user initially calculates the position of charge Q to be 0.366m from Charge 1, but later considers a position of 1.4m, suggesting that the charge should be placed outside the two existing charges for the net force to be zero. The participants emphasize the need to analyze the direction of forces and electric fields to find the correct placement of charge Q. The sign of charge Q is not explicitly determined in the discussion, but it is implied that it should be positive to balance the negative charge of Charge 2. Understanding the electric field's behavior is crucial for resolving the net force on charge Q.
Kathi201
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Charge 1 is located along the x-axis and has a magnitude of +1.6E-6C and Charge 2 is located 1m away from charge 1 with a magnitude of -4.8E-6C. A third point charge of magnitude Q is brought from far apart and placed on the line joining the two charges and at a point where the charge q experiences no net force at all. What is the distance of that point from the origin and what should be the sign of this unknown charge q?

This is what I came up with so far...

F1 = K (Q1)(Q2)/X^2
F2 = K (Q2)(Q3)/(1m-x)^2
You set them equal to each other and get
K(Q1)(Q2)/X^2 = K(Q2)(Q3)/(1.00-x)^2
Cancel out K and Q3 leaving;
(1.00-x^2)/X^2 = (Q2)/(Q1)
1.00-x/x = square root (4.8E-6C/1.6E-6C)
1.00-1x = 1.73x
1.00=1.73x +1x
1.00=2.73x
x = .366

Does anybody know if this is correct?

Also I do not know how to figure out what the sign of this charge should be so if anybody could help me I would appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kathi201 said:
Charge 1 is located along the x-axis and has a magnitude of +1.6E-6C and Charge 2 is located 1m away from charge 1 with a magnitude of -4.8E-6C. A third point charge of magnitude Q is brought from far apart and placed on the line joining the two charges and at a point where the charge q experiences no net force at all. What is the distance of that point from the origin and what should be the sign of this unknown charge q?

This is what I came up with so far...

F1 = K (Q1)(Q2)/X^2
F2 = K (Q2)(Q3)/(1m-x)^2
You set them equal to each other and get
K(Q1)(Q2)/X^2 = K(Q2)(Q3)/(1.00-x)^2
Cancel out K and Q3 leaving;
(1.00-x^2)/X^2 = (Q2)/(Q1)
1.00-x/x = square root (4.8E-6C/1.6E-6C)
1.00-1x = 1.73x
1.00=1.73x +1x
1.00=2.73x
x = .366

Does anybody know if this is correct?

Also I do not know how to figure out what the sign of this charge should be so if anybody could help me I would appreciate it!

You have chosen a point between the positive and negative charges. There is an E-field between those two charges at all points. What you found is the point at which the magnitudes are equal, but the direction is the same direction for both.

Choose a point outside the 2 charges, away from the larger one and closer to the smaller to fgure your Null point.
 
So if I choose a point to the right of the -4.8 charge then the vectors are in the opposite direction. So are you saying in that equation I should add x
so it would be

1.00+x = 1.73x
1.00=1.73x - 1x
1.00 = .73x

x = 1.4m

If that is right then how do I figure out the sign of the charge?

Thanks for your help!
 
Kathi201 said:
So if I choose a point to the right of the -4.8 charge then the vectors are in the opposite direction. So are you saying in that equation I should add x
so it would be

1.00+x = 1.73x
1.00=1.73x - 1x
1.00 = .73x

x = 1.4m

If that is right then how do I figure out the sign of the charge?

Thanks for your help!

Refresh my memory, does an e-field of 0 exert a force on any charge?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top