# Find the electric field inside a circle

• fluidistic
In summary: The relation is true for any intersecting diameter and a cord which is perpendicular to the diameter. Cord bisects the diameter.Let AB be the diameter and PQ is the cord. Let O be the point of intersection.Triangle OAP and OBQ are similar. So the sides are proportional. Hence OP/OB = OA/OQ OrOA*OB = OP*OQ. But OP = OQ. SoOA*OB = OP^2.In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of finding the electric field inside a charged circle at a point on a diameter, at a distance R/2 from the center. Various approaches are suggested, including setting up an integral and using symmetry to simplify the calculation. The
fluidistic
Gold Member

## Homework Statement

I set up myself to find the electric field inside a charged circle, but not in the center of the circle. Instead, in a point on a diameter, at a distance R/2 from the center, where R is the radius.
2. The attempt at a solution
I've tried to set up an integral summing the contribution of all the circle but without success. Is it a good idea? How would you proceed?
I know that the electric field must be 0, but as I'm not really convinced, I wanted to verify it.
Any help is appreciated.
dE=dQ/r².
$$Q=2 \pi R \lambda$$.
$$dl=xd\theta$$ where dl is a differential arc on the circle, $$\theta$$ is the angle measured from the horizontal diameter to the dl element and x is the distance between the point where I want to find the electric field and the dl element.

I would compute the field dE at your point P due to a bit of charge $dq = \lambda rd\theta$ and integrate around the circle. I would also look to see if there is any symmetry condition that makes solving the problem easier. (Note: this is my first take on how to approach it. There might be a better way.)

AEM said:
I would compute the field dE at your point P due to a bit of charge $dq = \lambda rd\theta$ and integrate around the circle. I would also look to see if there is any symmetry condition that makes solving the problem easier. (Note: this is my first take on how to approach it. There might be a better way.)

Ok perfect! That was the kind of reply I was hoping for. Thanks, I'll try to work something out.

I get $$d\vec E=\frac{Qd\theta}{2\pi Rr}\hat r$$ where R is the radius and r is the distance between P and dl.
I'm sure there's a $$cos \theta$$ that will appear from here, and integrating from 0 to $$2 \pi$$ I would eventually reach 0... but I don't know how to make the $$cos \theta$$ to appear. This is not new to me. I always struggle with this.

fluidistic said:
I get $$d\vec E=\frac{Qd\theta}{2\pi Rr}\hat r$$ where R is the radius and r is the distance between P and dl.
I'm sure there's a $$cos \theta$$ that will appear from here, and integrating from 0 to $$2 \pi$$ I would eventually reach 0... but I don't know how to make the $$cos \theta$$ to appear. This is not new to me. I always struggle with this.

Okay, so you got me hooked enough that I took another look at it. I drew a circle and drew a horizontal line I'll call the x-axis and a vertical y-axis. For each bit of charge $\lambda r d\theta$ there will be one symmetrically placed on the opposite side of the x axis. That means that the y components of the vector dE will cancel. That takes care of your $cos(\theta)$. You need that to get the x component of dE. What concerns me is that th expression for r is going to be messy, but I'm going to have to sign off soon. I'm curious as to what you're going to come up with...

AEM said:
Okay, so you got me hooked enough that I took another look at it. I drew a circle and drew a horizontal line I'll call the x-axis and a vertical y-axis. For each bit of charge $\lambda r d\theta$ there will be one symmetrically placed on the opposite side of the x axis. That means that the y components of the vector dE will cancel. That takes care of your $cos(\theta)$. You need that to get the x component of dE. What concerns me is that th expression for r is going to be messy, but I'm going to have to sign off soon. I'm curious as to what you're going to come up with...

You drew the same sketch than I. I also realized that the symmetry will automatically tell us that the E field in the y direction is null, but after all I wanted to prove it mathematically.
I'm also stuck as to write r... I'd have an "x" variable, but it doesn't seem easy to continue.
For example $$r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$$ or I could choose $$r=\frac{x}{\cos \theta}$$, though I don't know how to go any further. What limit to take in the integral for example.
$$\theta$$, 0 to $$2\pi$$. But x...
I've no idea.

If you start measuring x from the point R/2, using the properties of circle, you can write
y^2 = (R/2-x)*(3R/2+x)
You can take the integration form x = 0 to x = R/2 for smaller part and x=0 to x = 3R/2 for the larger part.

rl.bhat said:
If you start measuring x from the point R/2, using the properties of circle, you can write
y^2 = (R/2-x)*(3R/2+x)
You can take the integration form x = 0 to x = R/2 for smaller part and x=0 to x = 3R/2 for the larger part.

I thank you for your help and time. I don't understand how you reached this. Is it be simple Pythagorean theorem? I only see y²=r²-x² or y=r sin (theta).
Time for me to go to sleep, it's past 2 am and if I don't sleep now I won't sleep the night before the exam, ahah.

The relation is true for any intersecting diameter and a cord which is perpendicular to the diameter. Cord bisects the diameter.
Let AB be the diameter and PQ is the cord. Let O be the point of intersection.
Triangle OAP and OBQ are similar. So the sides are proportional.
Hence OP/OB = OA/OQ Or
OA*OB = OP*OQ. But OP = OQ. So
OA*OB = OP^2.

## 1. How do you find the electric field inside a circle?

To find the electric field inside a circle, you can use the formula E = kQ/r^2, where E is the electric field, k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge of the circle, and r is the distance from the center of the circle to the point of interest.

## 2. What is the direction of the electric field inside a circle?

The direction of the electric field inside a circle is radial, meaning it points directly towards or away from the center of the circle. This direction can be determined by the sign of the charge and the direction of the distance vector from the center to the point of interest.

## 3. Can the electric field inside a circle be negative?

Yes, the electric field inside a circle can be negative. This indicates that the direction of the electric field is towards the center of the circle, rather than away from it.

## 4. How does the electric field inside a circle vary with distance from the center?

The electric field inside a circle follows an inverse square relationship with distance from the center. This means that as the distance from the center increases, the electric field decreases.

## 5. Can the electric field inside a circle be affected by other charges outside the circle?

Yes, the electric field inside a circle can be affected by other charges outside the circle. The electric field at a point is the sum of the electric fields from all the charges in the system. So, if there are other charges outside the circle, their electric fields will contribute to the overall electric field at a point inside the circle.

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
346
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
873
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
285
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
64
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K