- #1
mfb said:Why did you rename the points?
In (a), you are asked about two points only, but calculating it for the third might help to see what went wrong.
Where did the prefactors come from (2,4,6)? It is difficult to find the error if you don't explain how you got these answers.
There is no charge in the conducting shell , so it's zero (+Q-Q=0)mfb said:Why do you add and subtract the charge of the conducting shell?
Almost. You have a mistake in P2 at the final step.Fatima Hasan said:
It should be ##\frac{kQ}{(r_2)^2}##haruspex said:Almost. You have a mistake in P2 at the final step.
Right.Fatima Hasan said:It should be ##\frac{kQ}{(r_2)^2}##
At P1 : ##E=0## , because ##Q_{enclosed}=0##haruspex said:Right.
What about part b? Do you wish to reconsider that answer?
Yes.Fatima Hasan said:At P1 : ##E=0## , because ##Q_{enclosed}=0##
At P2 : ##E = \frac{-KQ}{(r_2)^2}##
At P3 : ##E = \frac{-2KQ}{(r_3)^2}##
Good catch, missed the sign.haruspex said:Almost. You have a mistake in P2 at the final step.
The formula for calculating the electric field of a point P at a distance r is E = kq/r^2, where E is the electric field, k is the Coulomb's constant, q is the charge of the point P, and r is the distance between the point P and the charged object.
The direction of the electric field at point P is determined by the direction of the force that a small positive test charge would experience if placed at that point. The electric field always points away from a positive charge and towards a negative charge.
Yes, the electric field at point P can be zero if the point P is at the center of a uniformly charged sphere or if it is equidistant from two equal and opposite charges.
The unit of electric field is newtons per coulomb (N/C) or volts per meter (V/m).
The electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between point P and the charged object. This means that as the distance increases, the electric field decreases and as the distance decreases, the electric field increases.