Find the electrostatic interaction energy between the dipole

Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider the following pair of dipoles in one dimension.
One of the dipoles: -ve dipole positioned at (-D/2, 0) and +ve (+D/2, 0), with the origin between them.
Other dipole: -ve dipole positioned at (r-d/2, 0) and +ve at (r+d/2, 0), with (r, 0) being the centre.

Show that the total electrostatic interaction energy between the dipoles, when r is much greater than both d and D, is given by, V = – [1/2(Pi)*(epsilon nought)](QD)(qd)/r^3.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have attempted this question by considering a point x between the dipoles and finding the Electrostatic potential caused by each of the ends of the dipole. This ended up with 4 terms in a summation and I'm struggling to see how the correct answer is a multiplication? I believe some of the terms can be taken as zero when they are squared (in the limit where r>>d and D) but I'm not sure how to get to this step.

I would appreciate a push in the right direction, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint : You can use the field of one of the dipoles to find the potential developed for each charge on the other dipole ( to get to the appropriate distance from fromer dipole), and then add the two potentials thus obtained.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top