Find the factor by which the KE of the ball increases

  • Thread starter Thread starter nolee52738
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an elastic collision between a ball and a bat, both initially moving at 1.30 m/s. Participants suggest using a reference frame where the bat is at rest to simplify calculations. They emphasize the importance of applying conservation of momentum and energy principles to derive the final speeds of both objects post-collision. The conversation highlights the relationship between the velocities before and after the collision, noting that the bat's mass is significantly larger than the ball's. Ultimately, the goal is to determine both the final speed of the ball and the factor by which its kinetic energy increases due to the collision.
nolee52738
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Can anyone help me in this question?
1) A ball and bat, approach one another each with the same speed of 1.30 m/s, collide. Find the speed of the ball after the collision. (Assume the mass of the bat is much much larger than the mass of the ball and that this is an elastic collision with no rotational motion).
(in m/s)
2)Find the factor by which the KE of the ball increases due to the collision.



I have tried to solve it but I did not know how to continue.

Sorry for my broken english & thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Show what you have tried.

Hint: View things from a frame in which the bat is at rest.
 


*mass of the ball= m
mass of the bat= M
*speed of the ball after the collision= u1
speed of the bat after the collision= u2
*speed of the ball before the collision= v1= 1.30m/s
speed of the bat before the collision=v2= 1.30 m/s

*mv1 + Mv2 = mu1 + Mu2
1.30m + 1.30M = mu1 + Mu2

*0.5m*(1.30)^2 +0.5M*(1.30)^2 = 0.5m*(u1)^2 +0.5M*(u2)^2
1.69m + 1.69M = m*(u1)^2 + M*(u2)^2

And then I did not know how to continue.
 


I have tried this now:

(1)m(1.30-u1) = M(u2-1.30)
(2)m(1.69-u1^2) = M(u2^2 - 1.69)

(2)/(1) --> (1.69-u1^2)/(1.30-u1) = (u2^2 -1.69)/(u2-1.30)

(1.30-u1)(1.30+u1)/(1.30-u1)= (u2-1.30)(u2+1.30)/(u2-1.30)
1.30+u1 = u2 +1.30
u1=u2


??
 


I think the responder tried to make it easier for you by assuming the bat was at rest. To make the problem the same for this situation what would the velocity of the ball be?

Makes it a whole lot easier.
 


You can certainly solve the problem from the 'ground' frame, it's just harder. To do that, first combine the equations for conservation of momentum and energy to deduce a relationship about relative velocities before and after the collision.

Hint: Since the ball is assumed to be much heavier than the ball, M >> m, what can you say about the final speed of the bat to a good approximation?

My point was that it might be easier to solve this from a frame in which the bat is at rest. In that frame, the bat is like a wall. If you bounce a ball elastically off a wall, what is its final velocity? Get the answer in that frame, then transform back to the original frame.

nolee52738 said:
*mass of the ball= m
mass of the bat= M
*speed of the ball after the collision= u1
speed of the bat after the collision= u2
*speed of the ball before the collision= v1= 1.30m/s
speed of the bat before the collision=v2= 1.30 m/s

*mv1 + Mv2 = mu1 + Mu2
1.30m + 1.30M = mu1 + Mu2
Careful. While the speed of ball and bat is the same, their direction of motion is not. They move in opposite directions, so they have different velocities.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top