Find the flux through a surface S (Electromagnetic Theory)

jajay504
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q1 is located on the y-axis at r1= a (Y_hat) and another q2 located at the mirror point r2= -a (Y_hat). The charges are not necessarily the same sign or magnitude. Now consider the circular surface S of radius a contained in the x-z plane through the origin. Take the normal vector to this surface to point along the positive y-axis.

a.) Find the flux of the electric field through S.
b.) Use Mathematica to plot the field lines in the y-z plane through the origin for the following three cases: q2=-10q1, q2=q1, and q2=10q1.


Homework Equations



I have no idea how to start this problem or how to plug it into mathematica

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some effort at trying to solve the problem yourself before receiving help. This is pretty basic stuff. What's the field of a point charge? What's the definition of flux?
 
Flux= EA cos(theta)= E.A
I got flux = q/4e0

I don't have experience using mathematica at all
 
vela said:
You need to show some effort at trying to solve the problem yourself before receiving help. This is pretty basic stuff. What's the field of a point charge? What's the definition of flux?

Sorry for that. This one. I think I may have over thought it a bit.
 
jajay504 said:
Flux= EA cos(theta)= E.A
That only works for a constant electric field.
I got flux = q/4e0
How did you get this? What's q? The original problem has q1 and q2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top