Find the location knowing the resonance using Kepler's third law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kovac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
To find the location of celestial bodies in a 4:1 or 3:1 mean motion resonance with Jupiter using Kepler's third law, the orbital period (P) of the resonant body should be calculated as a fraction of Jupiter's orbital period. For a 4:1 resonance, P would be set to 1/4 of Jupiter's period, and the semi-major axis (a) can then be determined using the formula a^3 = P^2. The discussion also raises a question about the dimensional analysis of the formula, specifically how time squared relates to length cubed. Understanding the variables involved in these resonances and their directional implications is crucial for accurate calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful unit consideration when applying Kepler's laws.
Kovac
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: .

I need to find the location of following bodies MMR with Jupiter: 4:1, 3:1, with the help of Keplers third law.Keplers third law:
1697974988128.png
, where P is the orbital period in Earth years, a= semi major axis in AU.
For Jupiter: Pj =
1697975054421.png
years.

Now my question is, to find the location of 4:1, should I simply take 1/4 * Pj as the new P? (Since 4 orbits are made with each Jupiter orbit)
And then use the formula again with
1697974988128.png
to find the position for a? Meaning I need to solve for a with the new P?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd think a bit about units/dimensions first! How can a time squared equal a length cubed?
 
Could you explain in words what this phrase means?
Kovac said:
MMR with Jupiter: 4:1, 3:1,
Such as: to what variables do the 4:1 and 3:1 apply, and in which direction?

Cheers,
Tom
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top