Find the Maximum Height of an Inverted Garbage Can Suspended by a Geyser

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum height an inverted garbage can can reach when suspended by water from a geyser. The initial approach involved using momentum and force equations, but the derived formula for height was found to be incorrect. Participants noted that the velocity of water just before hitting the can should be considered, and clarified that the water falls under gravity after impacting the can. A specific example with values provided indicated that a correct calculation yields a height of 17 meters when using appropriate parameters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for the dynamics of the water's motion in the problem.
Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement


An inverted garbage can of weight ##W## is suspended in air by water from a geyser. The water shoots up the ground with speed ##v_0##, at a constant rate ##dm/dt##. The problem is to find the maximum height at which garbage can rides.

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose the garbage can is at its highest position ##h##.

Then the velocity of elementary mass ##\Delta m## just before collision with the can would be ##\sqrt{v_0^2 - 2gh}## and velocity after collision would be zero.

So change in momentum would be ##\Delta P = - \Delta m \sqrt{v_0^2 - 2gh}##

Or the force on the can would be ##F = \sqrt{v_0^2 - 2gh} \dfrac{dm}{dt}##

Since the forces on the can is balanced, therefore ##W = \sqrt{v_0^2 - 2gh} \dfrac{dm}{dt}##,

Solving for ##h## I got ##\displaystyle h = \dfrac{1}{2g}\left(v_0^2 - \left(W \over \dfrac{dm}{dt}\right)^2 \right)##

This is incorrect.

Where am I incorrect ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:
This is incorrect.
It all looks right to me. Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?
 
Buffu said:
velocity after collision would be zero.

So where does the water go ?
 
Nidum said:
So where does the water go ?
It falls. I do not see any basis for claiming that the water bounces off the bucket, or in any other way makes a greater contribution to supporting it. The bucket could be significantly wider than the jet.
 
haruspex said:
It all looks right to me. Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?

A clue was given; if ##v_0 = 20m/s##, ##W = 10 kg##, ##dm/dt = 0.5 kg/s## then ##h = 17 m##.

These values does not match when I put it into my formula :(.

@Nidum It falls down under gravity.
 
Buffu said:
A clue was given; if ##v_0 = 20m/s##, ##W = 10 kg##, ##dm/dt = 0.5 kg/s## then ##h = 17 m##.

These values does not match when I put it into my formula :(.

@Nidum It falls down under gravity.
I assume you mean W=10N.
That answer is clearly wrong. 20m/s is the speed at which the water needs to be moving when it reaches the bucket.
If you use g=9.8m/s2 and v0=27m/s it works out quite accurately to 17m.
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top