Find the period of Cosine of Quadratic function

cybershakith
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Hope some here can help me with this math problem.

Given,
y1 = ax^2 + b.
y2 = cos (y1).
where a and b are constants. Is y2 periodic with respect to x.? Visually using example grpah, seems to be periodic. How do u find the exact period of such a function?

Thanks in advance.

regards,
cybershakith
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From the graph you should see that it is not periodic, the wavelengths are decreasing as x grows larger. To prove this, assume it has period p, and find an x such that cos(ax^2+b) =/= cos(a(x+p)^2+b). Note that this only works when a is not 0. If a is zero the function is constant and trivially periodic.
 
I tried something along those lines.

cos (a*x^2 + b) = cos (a*(x+T)^2 + b)

Hence,
a*x^2 + b + 2* PI*k = a*(x+T)^2 + b, where is k is an integer.

Which reduces to,

2*PI*k = a*2*x*T + a * T^2

So T is function of x.

So the function is not periodic.

But let's take an example,
y = Cos (2*PI*ax^2 + 2*PI*b)
where is a =0.01277777778 and b = 255.5555556;

From plotting this graph, it seems like the y values are peridoc over x = 900.
So how does it happen?

for x =0;
y = Cos (2*PI*ax^2 + 2*PI*b) = Cos 2*PI * 255.5555556;

for x = 900;
y = Cos (2*PI*ax^2 + 2*PI*b) = Cos 2*PI*( 255.5555556 + 0.01277777778*900^2 ) = Cos 2*PI*(10605.5555556);


for x =11;
y = Cos (2*PI*ax^2 + 2*PI*b) = Cos 2*PI*( 255.5555556 + 0.01277777778*11^2 ) = Cos 2*PI*(257.10166671138);

for x = 911;
y = Cos (2*PI*ax^2 + 2*PI*b) = Cos 2*PI*( 255.5555556 + 0.01277777778*911^2 ) = Cos 2*PI*(10860.10166855538); //slight difference due to lack of precision.

This is true for all x, it seems.

this is because fractional part of ax^2 and a(x+T)^2 terms are the same.

So is it periodic?
 
I haven't checked out your examples in detail, I'd just like to add that the common way of calculating sin/cos on a computer becomes less accurate the further away from 0 the argument is. Thus it's possible that the observed period is due to numerical inaccuracies.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top