Find the steady-state temperature of the rod.

  • Thread starter Thread starter eunice064
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the steady-state temperature of a rod subjected to a heat source defined by f(x) = 0 for 0 < x < L/2 and f(x) = H for L/2 < x < L, with boundary conditions of zero temperature at both ends. The heat equation is presented as ut = uxx + f(x), but clarification is sought regarding the correct form of the equation and the role of f(x). The steady-state condition implies ut = 0, leading to the simplified equation uxx = f(x). Participants suggest solving the problem by dividing the rod into two segments, applying the Laplace equation for the left half and the Poisson equation for the right half, and ensuring continuity at the midpoint to determine unknown constants. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the equations and boundary conditions to find the solution.
eunice064
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A rod occupying the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ l is subject to the heat source

f(x) =0, for 0 < x < L/2
f(x) =H , for L/2 <x <L ,H>0

(1)The rod satisfies the heat equation ut = uxx + f(x) and its ends are kept at zero temperature. Find the steady-state temperature of the rod.
(2)Which pointis the hottest, and what is the temperature there?

From this point i don't know what to do

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eunice064 said:
A rod occupying the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ l is subject to the heat source

f(x) =0, for 0 < x < L/2
f(x) =H , for L/2 <x <L ,H>0

(1)The rod satisfies the heat equation ut = uxx + f(x) and its ends are kept at zero temperature. Find the steady-state temperature of the rod.
(2)Which pointis the hottest, and what is the temperature there?

From this point i don't know what to do

thanks

Are you sure you have stated the problem correctly? Isn't the 1-dimensional heat equation ##u_t = u_{xx}##? And is that ##f(x)## you have given the initial condition ##u(x,0)##? Why do you have ##f(x)## in the heat equation? Once you get that straight my hint would be to remember that steady state heat flow means there is no variation in temperature over time. So ##u_t=0##.
 
LCKurtz said:
Are you sure you have stated the problem correctly? Isn't the 1-dimensional heat equation ##u_t = u_{xx}##. And is that ##f(x)## you have given the initial condition ##u(x,0)##? Why do you have ##f(x)## in the heat equation? Once you get that straight my hint would be to remember that steady state heat flow means there is no variation in temperature over time. So ##u_t=0##.

thank you

so ut=0 ,i get uxx=f(x) with the boundary conditions is u(0)=0 & u(L)=0

How do I solve u?
 
You might first address the issues I raised about the form of the heat equation and about f(x).
 
You can break the domain into two parts, a left half and a right half. The left half is LaPlace equation in one dimension. The right half is the Poisson equation in one dimension. Solve them separately. The constant temperature boundary condition will make one constant of integration known for each domain. That leaves two unknown constants of integration, one for each half. They are determined by forcing continuity of temperature and heat flux at the midpoint which provides you with two equations so you can then determine the remaining two constants.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top