Finding the Sum of a Series: Solving for n(n-1)x^n

  • Thread starter BraedenP
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Series Sum
In summary, the conversation discusses finding the sum of the series \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n(n-1)x^n, |x|<1 and various methods to approach this problem. One suggestion is to expand the series and recognize the common factor, which can be written as a derivative. Another suggestion is to integrate the series and use the geometric series sum formula. Ultimately, the conversation leads to the conclusion that the sum of the series can be found by multiplying the sum of the corresponding geometric series by x^2.
  • #1
BraedenP
96
0

Homework Statement



I am asked to find the sum of the series:
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n(n-1)x^n, |x|<1[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



We've learned a bit about Taylor series, so I could approximate this answer by taking and summing the first few derivatives. However, I suspect a more exact answer is desired.

The second idea I had was to change the sum so that is starts at n=0:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+2)(n+1)x^{n+2}, |x|<1[/tex]

and then try to rearrange it into the form of a geometric series for which I know a sum formula. However, I haven't had much luck with my rearrangement.

Am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
BraedenP said:

Homework Statement



I am asked to find the sum of the series:
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n(n-1)x^n, |x|<1[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



We've learned a bit about Taylor series, so I could approximate this answer by taking and summing the first few derivatives. However, I suspect a more exact answer is desired.

The second idea I had was to change the sum so that is starts at n=0:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+2)(n+1)x^{n+2}, |x|<1[/tex]

and then try to rearrange it into the form of a geometric series for which I know a sum formula. However, I haven't had much luck with my rearrangement.

Am I missing something here?

Try expanding the series. If you do this, notice that there is a common factor that you can pull out. You might be able to recognize the remaining series as a derivative (or something) of a common series.
 
  • #3
Mark44 said:
Try expanding the series. If you do this, notice that there is a common factor that you can pull out. You might be able to recognize the remaining series as a derivative (or something) of a common series.

Hmm.. I'm trying to figure out what you mean by expand.

Do you want me to:
- Expand the terms in the sum so that I get [itex]n^2-nx^n[/itex]
- Expand the series for a few iterations (i.e. write it down for n=2,3,4, etc.)
or
- Perform a Taylor expansion on it where I use the formula [itex]c_n=\frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}[/itex]

None seem to reveal anything factorable to me.
 
  • #4
BraedenP said:
Hmm.. I'm trying to figure out what you mean by expand.
Write the terms in the series without using the summation sign. Obviously, you can't write all of them, since it's an infinite series, but write the first two or three, then ..., and the general term, and ...
BraedenP said:
Do you want me to:
- Expand the terms in the sum so that I get [itex]n^2-nx^n[/itex]
- Expand the series for a few iterations (i.e. write it down for n=2,3,4, etc.)
or
- Perform a Taylor expansion on it where I use the formula [itex]c_n=\frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}[/itex]
No, not this at all! The series already is a Taylor series (more specifically, a Maclaurin series.
BraedenP said:
None seem to reveal anything factorable to me.
 
  • #5
Mark44 said:
Write the terms in the series without using the summation sign. Obviously, you can't write all of them, since it's an infinite series, but write the first two or three, then ..., and the general term, and ...
No, not this at all! The series already is a Taylor series (more specifically, a Maclaurin series.

Yeah, this was option #2 in my list. I tried that, and found that only x was factorable, thus creating [itex]n(n-1)x\cdot x^{n-1}[/itex]

And this is closer to the geometric form I was looking for, but I don't see how I can apply the geometric series sum formula to it in this form; I need to get rid of the extra 'x' somehow...
 
  • #6
You can factor x2 out of every term. What do you get for the first three terms of the series? I'm thinking that you don't understand what I mean when I say to expand the series.
 
  • #7
Mark44 said:
Write the terms in the series without using the summation sign. Obviously, you can't write all of them, since it's an infinite series, but write the first two or three, then ..., and the general term, and ...
You mean like: 3x2 + 6x3 + ... even more? ... even more ?
 
  • #8
Mark44 said:
You can factor x2 out of every term. What do you get for the first three terms of the series? I'm thinking that you don't understand what I mean when I say to expand the series.

I get [itex]2x^2+6x^3+12x^4+...+n(n-1)x^n[/itex]

Oh, so I did make a mistake there. But factoring out x2 still doesn't illuminate anything for me. By doing that, I now have [itex]n(n-1)x^2\cdot x^{n-2}[/itex].

I still see no way to rewrite this as a geometric series. Sorry if I'm being a bother; but basically the only way we've been taught to sum an infinite series is to rewrite it as a geometric series and use the sum formula.

Unless my algebra is horrible this evening, I just can't see the connection.
 
  • #9
BraedenP said:
I get [itex]2x^2+6x^3+12x^4+...+n(n-1)x^n[/itex]
That's not quite right.

You should have gotten
[itex]2x^2+6x^3+12x^4+...+n(n-1)x^{n -2} + ...[/itex]
[itex]=x^2(2*1 + 3*2*x + 4*3*x^2 + ... + n(n-1)x^{n -2} + ...) [/itex]

Look at the part in the parentheses. Hint: derivative.

BraedenP said:
Oh, so I did make a mistake there. But factoring out x2 still doesn't illuminate anything for me. By doing that, I now have [itex]n(n-1)x^2\cdot x^{n-2}[/itex].

I still see no way to rewrite this as a geometric series. Sorry if I'm being a bother; but basically the only way we've been taught to sum an infinite series is to rewrite it as a geometric series and use the sum formula.

Unless my algebra is horrible this evening, I just can't see the connection.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
That's not quite right.

You should have gotten
[itex]2x^2+6x^3+12x^4+...+n(n-1)x^{n -2} + ...[/itex]
[itex]=x^2(2*1 + 3*2*x + 4*3*x^2 + ... + n(n-1)x^{n -2} + ...) [/itex]

Look at the part in the parentheses. Hint: derivative.

Oh! It's the derivative of [itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex] which I can evaluate as a geometric series. How do you just "see" this stuff in these equations?

So if I integrate it, the definite integral will equal the sum of the geometric series generated by integration.

Does this mean that if I multiply the sum of that geometric series by x2 I will have the answer to my question?
 
  • #11
BraedenP said:
Oh! It's the derivative of [itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex] which I can evaluate as a geometric series.
And further, [itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex] is the derivative of xn, right? So what you have in your general term is the 2nd derivative of xn, the general term in a geometric series.
BraedenP said:
How do you just "see" this stuff in these equations?
Probably from a misspent youth, differentiating and integrating infinite series.
BraedenP said:
So if I integrate it, the definite integral will equal the sum of the geometric series generated by integration.

Does this mean that if I multiply the sum of that geometric series by x2 I will have the answer to my question?

I think you have the basic idea, sort of, but you need to be very careful and write down step by step what you have, including my corrections/guidance above.
 
  • #12
Mark44 said:
And further, [itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex] is the derivative of xn, right? So what you have in your general term is the 2nd derivative of xn, the general term in a geometric series.
Probably from a misspent youth, differentiating and integrating infinite series.I think you have the basic idea, sort of, but you need to be very careful and write down step by step what you have, including my corrections/guidance above.

Awesome! But now I'm stuck on one more thing... I can't actually find the sum of the geometric series for which I have the derivative, because the summation starts at 2. Can I just find the sum as if it started at 0 and then subtract those first two terms?

Then I'll have that my original sum equals [tex]x^2\cdot \left (\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}nx^{n-1}\right )-1[/tex]
 
  • #13
You're not getting all of what I'm saying.

d/dx(xn) = nxn-1

and
[tex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}x^n = n(n - 1)x^{n - 2}[/tex]
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
You're not getting all of what I'm saying.

d/dx(xn) = nxn-1

and
[tex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}x^n = n(n - 1)x^{n - 2}[/tex]

I get that part, but what I don't get is how to convert the sum I get from that series back into what I have for the original.

So if I apply the sum formula to the derivative form ([itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex]), using x as r and n as a in [itex]\frac{a}{1-r}[/itex] and find this sum from the derivative, can I just derive the result (and multiply by x2 since we factored it out) and have it equal the sum of my original series?
 
  • #15
Isn't this what you have?
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n(n-1)x^n[/tex]
[tex]= x^2 \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^n\right)[/tex]
 
  • #16
Yep, that's what I've got (finally). Is that correct?
 
  • #17
Well, it isn't finished yet. Actually do the differentiation. What do you get?
 

1. What is the definition of a series?

A series is a sequence of numbers that are added together in a specific order.

2. How do you find the sum of a series?

To find the sum of a series, you must add up all the numbers in the sequence.

3. What is the formula for finding the sum of an arithmetic series?

The formula for finding the sum of an arithmetic series is (n/2)(2a + (n-1)d), where n is the number of terms, a is the first term, and d is the common difference.

4. How do you find the sum of a geometric series?

To find the sum of a geometric series, you must multiply the first term by the common ratio raised to the power of the number of terms minus one, and then subtract it from one over the common ratio minus one.

5. What is the difference between a finite series and an infinite series?

A finite series has a specific number of terms, while an infinite series has an unlimited number of terms. The sum of a finite series can be calculated, but the sum of an infinite series may not have a finite value.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
258
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
416
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
216
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
476
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
372
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
711
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
654
Replies
8
Views
993
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
345
Back
Top