MHB Find the value of 3/a + 3/a² + 3/a³.

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
AI Thread Summary
To find the value of 3/a + 3/a² + 3/a³ with a = √[3]{4} + √[3]{2} + 1, participants discuss substitution versus simplification methods. One approach involves letting λ = √[3]{2} and deriving a formula for a, leading to a more complex expression. Another participant notes that a can be interpreted as the sum of a geometric series, allowing for a different substitution that simplifies the expression. Ultimately, both methods yield similar results, indicating that the expression cannot be simplified further. The discussion highlights the importance of exploring multiple approaches to solve the problem effectively.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given $$a=\sqrt[3]{4}+\sqrt[3]{2}+1$$, find the value of $$\frac{3}{a}+\frac{3}{a^2}+\frac{3}{a^3}$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Find the value of 3/a+3/a²+3/a³.

anemone said:
Given $$a=\sqrt[3]{4}+\sqrt[3]{2}+1$$, find the value of $$\frac{3}{a}+\frac{3}{a^2}+\frac{3}{a^3}$$.

Am I missing something, or can we just substitute the value of a? Or are you expecting this to simplify to something simple? :P
 
Re: Find the value of 3/a+3/a²+3/a³.

Prove It said:
Am I missing something, or can we just substitute the value of a? Or are you expecting this to simplify to something simple? :P

Hi Prove It, I really think we have to substitute the value of a into the intended expression and further simplifying it from there...:)
 
Re: Find the value of 3/a+3/a²+3/a³.

anemone said:
Given $$a=\sqrt[3]{4}+\sqrt[3]{2}+1$$, find the value of $$\frac{3}{a}+\frac{3}{a^2}+\frac{3}{a^3}$$.
Let $\lambda = \sqrt[3]2$, so that $\lambda^3 = 2$. Then $(\lambda-1)a = (\lambda-1)(\lambda^2 + \lambda +1) = \lambda^3-1 = 2-1=1.$ Therefore $1/a = \lambda-1$, and $$\begin{aligned}\frac{3}{a}+\frac{3}{a^2}+\frac{3}{a^3} &= 3\bigl((\lambda-1) + (\lambda-1)^2 + (\lambda-1)^3\bigr) \\ &= 3(\lambda-1)(\lambda^2 - \lambda + 1) \\ &= 3(\lambda^3 -2\lambda^2 +2\lambda - 1) \\ &= 3(1+2\lambda-2\lambda^2) \\ &= 3 + 6\sqrt[3]2 - 6\sqrt[3]4.\end{aligned}$$ I don't see that it can be simplified further than that.
 
Re: Find the value of 3/a+3/a²+3/a³.

Thanks Opalg for participating in this problem and my answer is 'quite' similar to yours too.:)

My solution:

I noticed that $$a=\sqrt[3]{4}+\sqrt[3]{2}+1=1+\sqrt[3]{2}+\sqrt[3]{4}$$ is actually the sum of the first three terms of a geometric progression with first term and common ratio to be 1 and $$\sqrt[3]{2}$$ respectively and I found another way to rewrite $$a$$, i.e.

$$a=S_3=\frac{1((\sqrt[3]{2})^3-1)}{\sqrt[3]{2}-1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{2}-1}$$.

Therefore, the intended expression could be found by substituting this formula for $$a$$ into it to get:

$$\frac{3}{a}+\frac{3}{a^2}+\frac{3}{a^3}=\frac{3}{a^3}\left(1+a+a^2\right)=3(\sqrt[3]{2}-1)((\sqrt[3]{2})^2-\sqrt[3]{2}+1)$$

My little note to Prove It:

I am truly sorry, Prove It for telling you to substitute the value of $$a$$ straight into the equation and then to do the simplification, because what I am posting now is totally going against what I said to you but on the level, I did try to approach it using two ways and the initial one was to substitute first and simplify next.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top