Find velocity and Kinetic Energy of a Springy Toboggan

AI Thread Summary
Two kids use a spring with a stiffness of 750 N/m to launch a toboggan from a height of 9.5 m, with a combined mass of 95 kg. To find their speed at the bottom of the hill, the conservation of energy principle must be applied, equating the potential energy from the spring and gravitational potential energy to the kinetic energy at the bottom. The potential energy from the spring is calculated using U_spring = 0.5kx^2, while gravitational potential energy is U_grav = mgy. The initial calculations omitted the mass in the gravitational term and the correct units for gravity, leading to incorrect results. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
SelHype
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Two clever kids use a huge spring with 750 N/m to launch their toboggan at the top of a 9.5 m high hill (see the figure). The mass of the kids plus toboggan is 95.0 kg. If the kids manage to compress the spring 2.7 m, what will be their speed at the bottom of the hill? Neglect friction. What fraction of their final kinetic energy was initially stored in the spring?



Relevant equations:
K = .5mv^{2}
U_{spring} = .5kx^{2}
U_{grav} = mgy

My attempt at a solution:
Okay so \frac{N}{m} is \frac{kg}{s^{2}}.

To solve for \frac{m}{s} I have the following hint from my professor:

If we measure height from the bottom of the hill, initially the mass has potential energy
from gravity and the spring. At the end there is just kinetic energy. Write down the condition
for the conservation of energy and solve for the final speed.


Okay so the height from the bottom of the hill is 9.5m. I am actually kind of lost on this problem. I don't have my book, I can't find something online that explains this well enough for me to solve this problem, and it is 5am and this homework is due at 8am...even if I don't get it turned in by 8, I still want to understand how to find this. Once I find out how to solve it I can do the other problems!

Hints are my favorites so I can figure it out on my own! Thanks muchly!

SelHype



EDIT:

I tried this:

(9.8)(9.5m) + .5(2.7m)(2.7m)(750 N/m)

5.5 m/s


Clearly I am wrong, though...Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SelHype said:
I tried this:

(9.8)(9.5m) + .5(2.7m)(2.7m)(750 N/m)

That's a reasonable start. This is the (potential) energy at the top of the hill, with the spring compressed ... except that you left out:

The mass in the "mgy" term.
The units for g = 9.8 ____.

Once you have that number calculated, write an expression for the energy when the toboggan is at the bottom of the hill.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top