Find Width of Slit for Diffraction Maxima

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seigi Yokota
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Maxima
AI Thread Summary
To find the width of the slit in a single-slit diffraction problem, the relevant parameters include the wavelength of light (650 nm) and the distance between the first-order maxima (2.05 mm) on a screen 2.00 m away. The slit width can be approximated using the formula a*sin(Θ)=(m+0.5)λ for maxima, but the exact position of maxima requires differentiation of the intensity function. Initial attempts to calculate the slit width using both maxima and minima formulas yielded incorrect results. Clarification on the correct equation to use for finding the slit width is sought, emphasizing the need for precise calculations in diffraction scenarios. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in accurately determining diffraction maxima.
Seigi Yokota
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A single slit diffracts laser light of wavelength 650 nm onto a screen 2.00 m away. The distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 2.05 mm. How wide is the slit?

Homework Equations


a=width of slit
y=distance from central max to specific spot
L=distance of screen from the slit
λ=wavelength of light
sinΘ≈Θ=y/L
minima occurs at: a*sinΘ=mλ
(found on internet) approximation of maxima occurs at: a*sinΘ=(m+.5)λ

The Attempt at a Solution


L=2m
λ=650*10^-9m
each maxima is the same distance from the central maxima so if the distance between the 2 first order maxima is .00205m then
y=.001025m

a*(.001025/2)=(1.5)(650*10^-9)
I found answer to be 0.001902m (wrong)

just in case I decided to try and see using the minima formula a*(.001025/2)=(650*10^-9)
answer :0.001268m (wrong)

any assistance would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The maximum of the sinc function is not at m+0.5 . It's close, but not exactly.
 
Khashishi said:
The maximum of the sinc function is not at m+0.5 . It's close, but not exactly.
what equation should I use then?
 
You differentiate the intensity expression...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top