MHB Find x (Radians): Solve sec(2π/3 + x) = 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter eleventhxhour
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radians
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
If sec(2pi/3 + x) = 2, what does x equal?

So far I changed it to cos by dividing 1/2. And then, I changed the 1/2 to radians which is pi/3. But, I'm not sure what to do next.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you are going to find the general solution, you could write:

$$x+\frac{2\pi}{3}=2k\pi\pm\frac{\pi}{3}$$

And then solve for $x$. :D
 
Also you can do it using your way

$$sec(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x)=2$$

$$\frac{1}{cos(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x)}= 2$$

then

$$cos(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x) = \frac{1}{2}$$

$$\frac{2\pi}{3}+x=kx\pi \pm \frac{\pi}{3}$$

solve for x now ..

:)
 
Maged Saeed said:
...
$$cos(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x) = \frac{1}{2}$$

$$\frac{2\pi}{3}+x=kx\pi \pm \frac{\pi}{3}$$

...

How does that follow?
 
MarkFL said:
How does that follow?

$$cos(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x)=\frac{1}{2}$$

$$cos^{-1}cos(\frac{2\pi}{3}+x)=cos^{-1}(\frac{1}{2})$$

$$\frac{2\pi}{3}+x=\frac{\pi}{3}$$

To here , I think I'm correct because the range of arc-cos function is
from zero to PI.
But cannot we expand it to be (2xPI + PI/3) "the solution set of cos function"?

I'm not sure

(Thinking)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top