Find x(t) with Kx Force and Mass m | KxForce

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the motion of a particle of mass m under the influence of a force F(x) = kx, with initial conditions of starting position x0 and zero initial speed. Participants express confusion over the integration process and the correct application of acceleration in terms of velocity. There is a suggestion to apply integration rules while considering initial conditions to derive x as a function of time. Clarifications are made regarding the expression of acceleration and its relationship with velocity and time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the equations to find the solution.
Ryan95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is subject to force F(x)=kx with K>0. The initial starting position is x0 and the initial speed is zero. Find x(t).

Homework Equations


F(x)=kx
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, I am totally lost on this. I've written acceleration as v(dv/dx) which gave me mv(dv/dx)=Kx and then tried separating variables to integrate, but once I do that, I'm totally lost as I end up with m(v2/2)=K(x2/2).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ryan95 said:
Honestly, I am totally lost on this. I've written acceleration as v(dv/dt) which gave me mv(dv/dx)=Kx and then tried separating variables to integrate, but once I do that, I'm totally lost as I end up with m(v2/2)=K(x2/2).

i wonder how one can write acceleration as v..dv/dt as we know it as rate of change of velocity with time.. may be a typo.
now dv/dt can be expressed as d/dxof v multiplied by dx/dt .

i think you should proceed with the analysis as per the rule of integration and have initial conditions at t=0 and try to find x as a function of t. as one normally does with constant forces.
 
drvrm said:
i wonder how one can write acceleration as v..dv/dt as we know it as rate of change of velocity with time.. may be a typo.
now dv/dt can be expressed as d/dxof v multiplied by dx/dt .

i think you should proceed with the analysis as per the rule of integration and have initial conditions at t=0 and try to find x as a function of t. as one normally does with constant forces.

Oh, thank you, yes that was a typo. I've edited the post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top