Finding Acceleration in Uniform Circular Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter emyt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Omega
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on finding acceleration in uniform circular motion, the relationship between angular velocity (ω) and the velocity vector components is explored. The velocity components are expressed as i(-rωsin(θ)) and j(rωcos(θ)), leading to acceleration components of i(-rω²cos(θ)) and j(-rω²sin(θ)) upon differentiation. It is confirmed that in uniform circular motion, ω remains constant, allowing for consistent speed. For non-uniform circular motion, the need for angular acceleration (dω/dt) is acknowledged, indicating that ω is not constant. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between uniform and non-uniform circular motion in terms of angular velocity and acceleration.
emyt
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
circluar motion, "omega"

hi, I erased the default format by accident, but it's just a quick question:
i and j are unit vectors, w= omega dtheta/dt ,
theta= angle dependent on time

when we have i(-rwsin(theta)) and j(rwcos(theta)) as our velocity vector components,
and we wish to find the acceleration

i(-rwsin(theta)) and j(rwcos(theta)) is differentiated to i(-rw^2cos(theta)) and
j(-rw^2sin(theta))

the factor of omega remains constant because dtheta/dt will be the same everywhere since it is in uniform motion right? consistent speed?

thanks

edit: and if you did not have uniform circular motion, you would get

i(-r(a/r)wcos(theta)) and j(-rw(a/r)sin(theta)) as acceleration components:

using
w = dtheta/dt = v/r
d(v/r) / dt = 1/r(dv/dt) = a/r
when differentiating
-rwsin(theta), getting -r(a/r)wcos(theta) , remembering that theta is a function of time

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You are correct for the uniform circular motion part. For non-uniform (but still circular) motion, ω is not constant so you will need dω/dt terms.
 


kuruman said:
You are correct for the uniform circular motion part. For non-uniform (but still circular) motion, ω is not constant so you will need dω/dt terms.


thanks, dω/dt is d/dt(v/r) right? which is 1/r dv/dt, isn't that a/r?
 


emyt said:
thanks, dω/dt is d/dt(v/r) right? which is 1/r dv/dt, isn't that a/r?

You can say that, but I prefer to think of dω/dt as the angular acceleration alpha and leave it at that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top