Finding Balancing Point Between Earth and Sun

  • Thread starter Thread starter Littlemin5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Point Sun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the gravitational balance point between Earth and the Sun where the net gravitational force is zero. The calculations involve using Newton's law of gravitation, with the masses of Earth and the Sun and the distance between them. The initial attempt yielded a distance of 1.49 x 10^11 m, which was questioned due to its proximity to the total distance between Earth and the Sun. Participants clarified that the Sun's massive size means the balance point is much closer to the Sun, requiring the object to be approximately a million kilometers from Earth. This understanding emphasizes the dominance of the Sun's gravity in the solar system.
Littlemin5
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the point between Earth and the Sun at which an object an be placed so that the net gravitatinal force exerted by Earth an the sun on this object is zero.

Me=5.98 x 10^24kg
Ms=2 x 10^30kg
Distance from sun to earth= 1.5 x10^11m

Homework Equations



F=Gm1m2/r^2 --> not sure if this is right?

The Attempt at a Solution



So I tried to manipulate the situation and thought I could do:
When x equals the distance from the sun.

(G(Ms)) / x^2 = (G(Me))/ (d-x)^2

When I plugged in the numbers though I got 1.49x10^11m as my answer. I don't feel like this is right because it's pretty much the full distance between them. Is this not the way to do it, and if not how do I go about doig this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Newton's law of gravitation is certainly right ;-)

Your method looks fine to me. Think about it intuitively. The sun is ridiculously huge, right? In fact, the sun is SO much more massive than anything else in the solar system, that it plays a dominant role over all of the gravitational interactions that occur. In this case, that means that your object has to be MOST of the way along the distance from the sun to the Earth before Earth's gravity starts to dominate. I mean, I think you can see from your numbers exactly how this result came about. The sun is more massive by six orders of magnitude (a factor of a million!)

Keep in mind also that the distance of the object from the Earth (1.5 - 1.49 hundred billion) is nothing to sneeze at (in human terms).

0.01 x 10^11 m = 10^9 m = 10^6 km

So out of the 150 million kilometres distance from here to the sun, the object has to travel a million kilometres away from Earth before the sun's gravity begins to dominate. That may only be a fraction of the distance to the sun, but it's still a million kilometres.
 
Last edited:


When you explain it like that then my answer makes more sense. Thanks so much though for clearing that all up!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top