Finding coefficient of thermal expansion and isothermal compressibility

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of ammonia using the Bertholet equation of state and comparing it to the ideal gas law, with results showing 0.251 m³ for the former and 0.256 m³ for the latter. Participants discuss how to derive expressions for the coefficient of thermal expansion and isothermal compressibility, suggesting that evaluating the derivatives at the calculated volume is appropriate. There is a note on the importance of using correct units, particularly converting pressure to Pascals for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the need for careful unit management in thermodynamic equations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the application of the Bertholet equation for ammonia under specified conditions.
osker246
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To a very good approximation, ammonia obeys the Bertholet equation of state,
which readsPV=nRT+\frac{9}{128}(\frac{nRTc}{Pc})(1-6\frac{Tc^2}{T^2})Pa)Suppose we have 500 grams of ammonia under a pressure of P=3.04 atm
and at T=323K. Calculate the volume of ammonia according to the
Bertholet equation of state and compare to the result predicted by the ideal
gas law.

b)Assuming ammonia obeys the Bertholet equation of state obtain
expressions for the coefficient of thermal expansion\beta=\frac{1}{V}(\frac{dV}{dT})p and the isothermal compressibility \kappa=\frac{-1}{V}(\frac{dV}{dP})T (note: these are partial derivatives at constant P and T). Evaluate β and κ for 500 grams of ammonia at P=3.04 atm and at T=323K.

c)Using your results from part b, calculate (\frac{dU}{dV})T and (\frac{dH}{dP})T for 500 grams of ammonia at P-3.04 atm and T=323K.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I found the answer to part A which was 0.251 m^3 using Bertholet eqn. of state and 0.256 m^3 using ideal gas law.

Now I am not sure about part B. I have a feeling I can accomplish this buy simply solving for volume with Bertholet eqn. of state (or ideal gas law) and simply evaluating the derivative at that point; with T being my variable for beta and P being the variable for kappa. Is that the proper way to evaluate beta and kappa in this situation? Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is something wrong with your units.

Using PV = nRT, I calculate V = 0.256 cubic meters for 500 grams of NH3 at 3.04 atm and 323 K. Have you used the correct R value?
 
Ahh yes I forgot to convert pressure into Pascals. Thanks for the heads up.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top