Finding concentration of Permanganate

  • Thread starter Thread starter lcary
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
To find the concentration of KMnO4 in the solution, the dilution formula m1v1=m2v2 was applied, where 2.00x10-3 M is the concentration of the stock solution and the total volume after mixing is 6 mL. The initial attempt to solve for m2 was incorrect due to a miscalculation or formatting error in significant figures. After addressing the significant figures issue, the correct concentration was obtained. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precision in calculations and formatting when entering answers in educational programs. Proper attention to significant figures is crucial for accurate results in chemistry calculations.
lcary
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the KMnO4 concentration of the solution in the cuvet. The Solution in the covet was made by mixing 5.00 ml of 1.00 M H2SO4 and 1.00 ml of the stock 2.00x10-3 M KMnO4.

Homework Equations


m1v1=m2v2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried using the dilution formula m1v1=m2v2 to find the answer with no luck. First I tried the following: 2.00x10-3 M * 0.001L = m2 * 0.006L. I solved for m2 and the program said my answer was incorrect, I've quadruple checked to make sure I didn't make a simple mistake. Then I tried to figure out how many moles were in 1ml of a 2.00x10-3 Molar solution but then I realized this still wouldn't give me the concentration and I wouldn't know where to go next with the value I obtained. I don't know what else to try. Help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The potassium permanganate was diluted to one sixth of the original value. You added 5 parts containing no permanganate to one part containing permanganate. That is 6 parts of added liquids from which only one part contained permanganate.
 


lcary said:
First I tried the following: 2.00x10-3 M * 0.001L = m2 * 0.006L. I solved for m2 and the program said my answer was incorrect

Your approach is correct. Either you are entering incorrect number of significant figures, or program accepting answer expects the number in different format, but (unless you solved for m2 incorrectly) you should get the correct result.
 


Borek said:
Your approach is correct. Either you are entering incorrect number of significant figures, or program accepting answer expects the number in different format, but (unless you solved for m2 incorrectly) you should get the correct result.

Thank you for replying. I wasn't entering in the correct number of significant figures, once I corrected for the error, I got the right answer.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top