Finding coordinates given 3-dimensional vectors

AI Thread Summary
To find the fourth vertex of a parallelogram defined by vectors u and v, the coordinates are determined to be (3, -4, 0) by calculating u + v. For the diagonals, the larger diagonal is identified as u + v, while the smaller diagonal can be either u - v or v - u, depending on the perspective taken. The discussion clarifies that both forms of the smaller diagonal are valid. The participants express some uncertainty about the terminology and calculations but ultimately arrive at the correct answers. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector operations in three-dimensional space.
mystmyst
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \vec{u} = 2 \hat{x} - 3 \hat{y} + \hat{z}<br /> \vec{v} = \hat{x} - \hat{y} - \hat{z}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Given a parallelogram that's vertex is at the origin (0,0,0) and is created by two vectors u and v:

a) find where the fourth vertex is of the parallelogram
b) find the length of the two diagonals

The Attempt at a Solution



a) since it's a parallelogram, the fourth point is at u + v = 3 \hat{x} - 4 \hat{y} ------- I'm not sure if the answer is supposed to be in this form or in form (3,-4,0)

b) I'm not sure about this one. By length, do they mean distance? Should I use the distance formula between two points? Or do they possibly mean vector addition/subtraction?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mysmyst.

a) The vector u+v points to the fourth vertex, whose coordinates are (3,-4,0)

b) You may calculate the vectors that follow the diagonals, from u and v, and then calculate their modules.
 
the big diagonal is obviously u+v. but is the little diagonal u-v or v-u? and how do I tell which it is in general?

Thanks!
 
The little diagonal is (v-u) and also (u-v). It doesn't matter. It depends on which sense you see it.
 
o. that was silly (:

Thanks!

is there a thanks button?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top