Finding current across resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter notmetalenough
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Resistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the current through a 21.3-ohm resistor in a complex circuit. The user initially combined resistors incorrectly, leading to confusion about their arrangement. Clarifications indicate that the 27.15-ohm resistor is in series with the 11.7-ohm resistor, while the equivalent resistance of the parallel components is 3.41 ohms. The total resistance of the circuit is confirmed to be 15.11 ohms, resulting in a total current of 1.33 amps. Ultimately, the voltage drop across the resistors is analyzed to determine the current flow through each branch accurately.
notmetalenough
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm not quite sure how I'm supposed to be doing this problem.

Consider the circuit shown in the figure below.

R = 21.3 ohms

http://east.ilrn.com/graphing/bca/user/appletImage?dbid=411814203

Find the current in the 21.3 ohm resistor.


I combined (serial) R with the 5.85 ohm resistor, getting an equivalent resistance of 27.15 ohms. Then combined the middle (parallel) 11.7 and the other 5.85, getting an equivalent resistance of 3.9 ohms. Then I combined the 3.9 and the 27.15 as parallel resistors leaving me with a 3.41 ohm resistor and an 11.7 ohm resistor in series. which I added together to get a total resistance of 15.11 ohms.

I then divided the Voltage by the resistance to get the amount of current, and worked backwards applying it to each series part and then dividing it among the parallel components.

I ended up getting something along the lines of 0.283 A through the 21.3 resistor. Did I miss something somewhere? Did I combine these correctly?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The middle 11.7 ohm, the bottom 5.85 ohm, plus the 27.15 ohm series are all in parallel in this arrangement. An inverse sum of this parallel is 3.41 ohms.
 
Chi Meson said:
The middle 11.7 ohm, the bottom 5.85 ohm, plus the 27.15 ohm series are all in parallel in this arrangement. An inverse sum of this parallel is 3.41 ohms.

Yeah, I had that in there. The parallel set is then in series with the top 11.7, and then I still can't get the right answer.
 
The 27.15 resistor is still in series with the 11.7 in the middle, not in parallel. It's better to combine the 3 in series so you have 3 parallel. The voltage over resistors in parallel are equal, so you can calculate the current over the equivalent resistor.
 
Romperstomper said:
The 27.15 resistor is still in series with the 11.7 in the middle, not in parallel. It's better to combine the 3 in series so you have 3 parallel. The voltage over resistors in parallel are equal, so you can calculate the current over the equivalent resistor.

No it's not. The current splits at the junction near the "a" dot. It rejoins at the junction near the "b" dot.


The total resistance of the circuit is 15.11 ohms, so the total current is 1.33 amps.

The voltage drop through the top 11.7 ohm resistor is 15.56 volts, which leaves 4.54 volts across the parallel. 4.54 volts across the 27.15 ohm series says that 0.17 amps flows through this branch.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top