Finding Delta for Epsilon in x^3 Function for c=5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Epsilon
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


find a δ for a given ε for f(x)=x3 around c=5:
$$\vert x-5\vert<\delta~\Rightarrow~\vert x^3-5^3 \vert < \epsilon$$

Homework Equations


Continuity:
$$\vert x-c \vert < \delta~\Rightarrow~\vert f(x)-f(c) \vert < \epsilon$$
$$\delta=\delta(c,\epsilon)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$\vert x^3-5^3 \vert =\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert x^2+5x+25 \vert$$
$$=\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert (x-5)^2+15(x-5)+75 \vert < \epsilon$$
$$\delta \cdot (\delta^2+15\delta+75)<\epsilon$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: look at ##x^2+5x+25##. What can you do with that if ##x## is "close enough" to ##5##?
 
A) What is your question?
B) If I give you a value for epsilon, can you give me a value for delta (a value for delta itself, that is) ?
 
If x is close to 5 from the left side then:
$$\vert x^3-5^3 \vert =\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert x^2+5x+25 \vert < 75\delta~\rightarrow~\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{75}$$
But if x is on the right?
 
Karol said:
If x is close to 5 from the left side then:
$$\vert x^3-5^3 \vert =\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert x^2+5x+25 \vert < 75\delta~\rightarrow~\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{75}$$
But if x is on the right?

I was thinking more that if ##x## is close to ##5## then ##x^2 + 5x + 25 \approx 75##.

And, if ##|x - 5| < 1##, say, then how big can ##x^2 + 5x + 25## be?
 
if ##~|x-5|<1##:
$$\vert x^3-5^3 \vert \triangleq\epsilon=\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert x^2+5x+25 \vert < 91\delta~\rightarrow~\delta>\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$
But it should be ##~\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{91}##
 
Karol said:
if ##~|x-5|<1##:
$$\vert x^3-5^3 \vert \triangleq\epsilon=\vert x-5 \vert \cdot \vert x^2+5x+25 \vert < 91\delta~\rightarrow~\delta>\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$
But it should be ##~\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{91}##

I think you are getting yourself confused in some way. You start with:

##|x^3 - 5^3| = |x-5||x^2 +5x + 25|##

Now you let ##|x -5| < 1##, which implies ##4 < x < 6##, which implies that ##|x^2 +5x + 25| < 91##

Putting that together you have:

##|x -5| < 1 \ \Rightarrow \ |x^3 - 5^3| < 91|x-5|##

Now, if you let ##\epsilon > 0## can you finish it off?

Hint: Let ##|x-5| < \dots ##
 
$$\delta\triangleq |x-5|=\frac{|x^3-5^3|}{|x^2+5x+25|}=\frac{\epsilon}{|x^2+5x+25|}<\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$
$$\Rightarrow\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$
 
I give you ##\epsilon = 200\ ##. Then ## \delta =2 < {200\over 91}\ ## is not good enough ...
 
  • #10
Karol said:
$$\delta\triangleq |x-5|=\frac{|x^3-5^3|}{|x^2+5x+25|}=\frac{\epsilon}{|x^2+5x+25|}<\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$
$$\Rightarrow\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{91}$$

That's the background analysis, but it's not a proof, because you've got no explanation of what you are doing and the implication is the wrong way at the end.

What you've shown is:

##|x - 5| = \delta \ \Rightarrow \ \delta < \frac{\epsilon}{91}##

(I'm sorry to say I don't know what the little triangle means.)

You need to turn the logic round, so that for a given ##\epsilon## you have a well-defined ##\delta##.

Also, don't forget that you needed ##|x-5| < 1## as well.
 
  • #11
I wasn't told, in the original question, that ##~|x-5| < 1~##.
And for |x-5|<1 it's correct ##~\delta < \frac{\epsilon}{91}##. but for all real numbers on x i don't know what to do since |x-5| doesn't appear in (x2+5x+25)
##\triangleq## means definition, a symbol given to
 
  • #12
Karol said:
I wasn't told, in the original question, that ##~|x-5| < 1~##

You weren't told that ##|x -5| < \epsilon /91## either. So, where did that come from?
 
  • #13
Karol said:
I wasn't told, in the original question, that ##~|x-5| < 1~##/QUOTE]

You weren't told that ##|x -5| < \epsilon
 
  • #14
Karol said:
I wasn't told, in the original question, that ##~|x-5| < 1~##

You weren't told that ##|x -5| < \epsilon /91## either.
 
  • #15
##|x -5| < \epsilon /91~## came from the condition ##~|x - 5| < 1## you proposed, and i guess ##~\delta<\frac{\epsilon}{91}~## satisfies this condition, but i am not sure.
And even if i solve correctly for ##~|x - 5| < 1~## it's not a general answer for all x
 
  • #16
Karol said:
And even if i solve correctly for ##~|x - 5| < 1~## it's not a general answer for all x

Yes it is a solution. You are free to choose ##x## as close to 5 as you like. That's the whole point. If you can't choose ##x## close to ##5## how can you prove continuity?

If you look at ##x = 1,000,000## then even large ##\epsilon## is a problem.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
Yes it is a solution. You are free to choose x as close to 5 as you like. That's the whole point. If you can't choose x close to 5 how can you prove continuity?
I don't think it's a solution, since the definition of continuity first chooses ε and derives a δ. i choose ε as small as i want and the δ becomes small, x comes close to 5.
Yes, large ε is out of the domain |x-5|<1 (ε is not in the domain, it's on the Y axis, of course)
 
  • #18
Karol said:
I don't think it's a solution, since the definition of continuity first chooses ε and derives a δ. i choose ε as small as i want and the δ becomes small, x comes close to 5.
Yes, large ε is out of the domain |x-5|<1 (ε is not in the domain, it's on the Y axis, of course)

Unfortunately, then, I don't think I can help you any further.
 
  • #19
I am sorry i sounded not polite, PeroK, please help, i have no idea how to solve even for |x-5|<1, as you suggested and i am very frustrated
 
  • #20
You have shown that for ##\varepsilon < 91 \ ## the condition ##\delta < {\varepsilon \over 91} \ ## is sufficient. I think that should be good enough for this exercise.

Personally, all I wanted to point out was that: just ##\delta < {\varepsilon \over 91} \ ## in itself is not really sufficient if you take the exercise wording literally.

In analysis statements are made like 'For all ##\varepsilon > 0 \ ## there exists a ##\delta > 0\ ## such that ... ' with the silent implication/intention that ##\varepsilon## can be made as small as desired (you ##\ ## look at/worry about ##\ ## the possibility to find a ##\delta## for ##\varepsilon \downarrow 0## ).

Outside of such a context nitpckers like me can point out that a simple expression for ##\delta## may fail for big ##\varepsilon##
 
  • Like
Likes ThePiGeek314
  • #21
Karol said:
I am sorry i sounded not polite, PeroK, please help, i have no idea how to solve even for |x-5|<1, as you suggested and i am very frustrated

I think you probably need some one-to-one tuition on this, as your questions are difficult to answer.

I don't think @BvU is nit-picking. You need to say something about large ##\epsilon##. And, it's critical to establish an intermediate bound on ##|x-5|## in order to get the main, variable bound based on ##\epsilon##.

More fundamentally, you need to look carefully at why we can take ##|x-5|<1##. It helps to limit ##\delta##, even when ##\epsilon/91## is large.
 
  • #22
@Karol

Let me show you a rigorous proof for ##x^2## at ##x = 5##. Note that you can find this online in any case. E.g.

https://www.freemathhelp.com/forum/threads/62586-rigorously-prove-x-2-is-continuous

But, my version will be a little more step-by-step.

Let ##\epsilon > 0##.

##|x^2 - 5^2| = |x-5||x+5|##

Let ##|x-5| < 1##, then:

##4 < x < 6##, ##|x+5| < 11## and:

##|x^2 - 5^2| < 11|x-5|##

Now, further, let ##|x-5| < \epsilon/11##. Then:

##|x^2 - 5^2| < \epsilon##

Putting this all together we have shown that:

##\forall \ \epsilon > 0, |x-5| < min \{ 1, \frac{\epsilon}{11} \} \ \Rightarrow \ |x^2 - 5^2| < \epsilon##

Thus, we have proved that ##x^2## is continuous at ##x=5##.

(Note that I didn't in fact use the symbol ##\delta##. If this offends or confuses you, then you can write:

Let ##\delta = min \{ 1, \frac{\epsilon}{11} \}##, then:

##\forall \ \epsilon > 0, |x-5| < \delta \ \Rightarrow \ |x^2 - 5^2| < \epsilon##)

Try to work through this and understand the sequence of steps and the logic.
 
  • #23
Thank you very much PeroK and BvU
 

Similar threads

Back
Top