Finding Derivatives with Respect to a Variable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function y = 4 ln(2t) with respect to the independent variable. Participants explore the appropriate differentiation techniques, particularly focusing on the chain rule and implicit differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule and whether implicit differentiation is necessary. There are attempts to clarify the derivative of ln(x) and how it relates to the problem at hand. Some participants suggest using substitution to simplify the differentiation process.

Discussion Status

The conversation has led to a better understanding of the chain rule's application in this context. Participants are exploring different methods and confirming the validity of their approaches, but there is no explicit consensus on a single method being the best.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the need for implicit differentiation versus the sufficiency of the chain rule, indicating a potential gap in understanding the problem setup.

ialan731
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question says ti find the derivative of y with respect to the independent variable.
The equation is: y=4 ln 2t.


Homework Equations



I know how to find derivatives using the product/quotient/chain/etc rules, but that isn't what the question is asking for. I though it wanted me to use implicit differentiation, but that doesn't really make sense because y is explicitally defined in terms of x. I don't really know what should be used.

The Attempt at a Solution



Before, I tried to just get the derivative normally and got 4 ln 2t +2/t, but that's not right. Then I also tried using implicit differentiation, but it wasn't working.

By the way, the answer is (ln4/t)4 ln 2t

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the derivative of ln(x) ?

If you know the derivative of that, then you can simply apply the chain rule.

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 4\frac{d}{dx}ln(2x)[/tex]

recall that [tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{du}\frac{du}{dx}[/tex]
 
The derivative of ln(x) is 1/x.

Am I supposed to use implicit differentiation, then? Or is the chain rule enough?
 
The chain rule is plenty.

What you can do is simply use a substitution. Let some function U(t) equal the "contents" of the original (ln) function.

Then find the derivative of ln(U), then apply the chainrule.
 
The derivative of ln(U) would just be 1/U then. I would only be working with the equation 4ln(U). After I use the chain rule for that equation, would I substitute the original ln function?
 
4 is a constant so it just comes outside, then let f(x) = ln(U), and let U(x) = 2t then simply recall the chain rule:

[tex]4\frac{df}{dx} = 4\frac{df}{du} \frac{du}{dx}[/tex] //I just multiplied in a 4 there for the constant
 
Okay. I get it now. This would work for all problems like this, right?
 
Well yes. Technically you ALWAYS are using the chain rule. It's just that for cases like the derivative of y=x (y'=1), the "inner product" or composite function's derivative is just 1 also.

If you have a ton of functions, let's say something like this:

y = x, x = t, t = p

You can see that you could just substitute it all in, or you can simply follow the chain rule:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dp} = \frac{dy}{dx} \frac{dx}{dt} \frac{dt}{dp}[/tex]

and so on, up to an infinite number of nestled composite functions.
 
Great! This was the one thing I was worried about, but it doesn't seem to be too bad now. Thank you!
 
  • #10
What solution did you get?
 
  • #11
I got (ln4/t)4 ln 2t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K