MHB Finding domain of a trigonometric function

AI Thread Summary
The function f(x) = (1+x) / e^(cos(x)) is defined for all x. The numerator, 1+x, is defined for all real numbers. The denominator, e^(cos(x)), is always positive since e^(cos(x)) is never zero. Therefore, there are no restrictions on the domain. The domain of the function is all real numbers.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I need to find the domain of this function:

$$f(x) = \frac{1+x}{ e^{cos(x)}}$$

I set $${ e^{cos(x)}}> 0$$

But I'm not sure what to do after this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
I need to find the domain of this function:

$$f(x) = \frac{1+x}{ e^{cos(x)}}$$

I set $${ e^{cos(x)}}> 0$$

But I'm not sure what to do after this.

The top is obviously defined for all x.

The bottom, as you have established, is always positive. As both cos(x) and e^x are defined for all x, so is their composition.

So the top and bottom are defined for all x. The only place where the quotient of the two functions might not be defined is where the denominator is 0. But you already established that this doesn't happen anywhere.

So what is the domain of your function?
 
Prove It said:
The top is obviously defined for all x.

The bottom, as you have established, is always positive. As both cos(x) and e^x are defined for all x, so is their composition.

So the top and bottom are defined for all x. The only place where the quotient of the two functions might not be defined is where the denominator is 0. But you already established that this doesn't happen anywhere.

So what is the domain of your function?

All real numbers?
 
tmt said:
All real numbers?

Correct :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top