Finding Electric Field at r>= R with Four Point Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at distances r >= R from a configuration of four point charges: two positive (+q) and two negative (-q). It is established that according to Gauss's law, the electric field outside a closed surface enclosing these charges should be zero, as the net charge inside is zero. However, it is noted that Gauss's law cannot be universally applied without specific symmetries, and in cases like an electric quadrupole, the electric field can be nonzero outside the enclosing surface. The key takeaway is that while the flux through a surface at r >= R is zero, the electric field itself may not be. Understanding the specific charge arrangement is crucial for accurate field calculations.
bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four point charges, two of charge +q and two of charge -q, are placed in an arbitrary way. Each charge is located a distance r_i < R from the origin. Find the electric field at r >= R.

Homework Equations



According to Gauss's law, the field should be zero, right?

<br /> \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{dA} = \frac{Q_\text{inside}}{\epsilon_0} = 0 \, .<br />


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm thinking the electric field should be zero outside any surface that totally encloses the charges. Is this the correct reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigplanet401 said:

Homework Statement



Four point charges, two of charge +q and two of charge -q, are placed in an arbitrary way. Each charge is located a distance r_i < R from the origin. Find the electric field at r >= R.

Homework Equations



According to Gauss's law, the field should be zero, right?

<br /> \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{dA} = \frac{Q_\text{inside}}{\epsilon_0} = 0 \, .<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm thinking the electric field should be zero outside any surface that totally encloses the charges. Is this the correct reasoning?

My reasoning is that the FLUX should be zero because the field lines corresponding to 2q+ are pointing out and the 2q- field lines point in. Mathematically, this just means Q_{net in}=0 This means that the right side of Gauss's law zeros out so the flux is zero.
 
Last edited:
Where did you get this question? You cannot use Gauss' law in general to calculate the electric field unless you have some rather strong symmetries (usually planar, cylindrical, or spherical).

The electric quadrupole is an example of using the four charges in your question while producing a nonzero electric field at r>=R. An electric quadrupole is formed by alternating positive and negative charges arranged on the corners of a square. That square could certainly lie within a sphere of radius R. But the electric field of an electric quadrupole is certainly not zero outside that sphere. Check out the electric quadrupole section of wikipedia's page on quadrupole.

As AdkinsJr says, if you were asked for the electric FLUX over any closed surface lying in the region r>=R then the answer would definitely be zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top